well...in some countries its considered illegal to say the word trapezoid. In fact a scientist by the name of Tom Ato states" when dealing with trapezoids you need to consider three things...bacon, bacon, and bacon"
No, a square is never a trapezoid.
Sure it can. A trapezoid has two parallel sides; a square has both pairs of side parallel. Therefore, all square are automatically trapezoids.
A square cannot be a trapezoid because a trapezoid has only one set of parallel lines. One of the trapezoids lines will eventually intersect. A square has two pairs of parallel lines.
Square = parallelogram and a square trapezoid = trapezoid Parallelogram = Parallelogram
a trapezoid is slanted and a square is not
A square needs to have 4 EQUAL sides. Whereas a Trapezoid's top and bottom sides are different lengths.
No, a square is never a trapezoid.
it can not be a square
Sure it can. A trapezoid has two parallel sides; a square has both pairs of side parallel. Therefore, all square are automatically trapezoids.
A square cannot be a trapezoid because a trapezoid has only one set of parallel lines. One of the trapezoids lines will eventually intersect. A square has two pairs of parallel lines.
Square = parallelogram and a square trapezoid = trapezoid Parallelogram = Parallelogram
a trapezoid is slanted and a square is not
a trapezoid is slanted and a square is not
No, it is either a trapezoid or a square.
A trapezoid cannot be a parallelogram, since two of its opposing sides will never be parallel.
Look at the amazing four-sided trapezoid! That 'square' is not square, it is a trapezoid.
A square can't be a trapezoid because it has two parellel sizes.