Why interval, notation cannot be used to represent instead of atomic masses
You cannot. A number in scientific notation will be in its simplest form.
-4
You cannot have a preceding class to the first class. There is no zeroth class.
Example for the uranium isotope 235: 23592U where 235 is the mass number and 92 is the atomic number. Note 92 is under 235 but I cannot write here.
No dear, I cannot answer this question...
2.4299999999999997
The atomic model cannot be extremely accurate.
No the cannot.
113 is not a complex number and so there cannot be any correct notation.
Only the counting numbers can exist as atomic numbers. Fractions and decimals cannot be an atomic number.
You cannot represent a proportional relationship using an equation.
6.4301 = 64301/10000, which cannot be simplified.