Yes, medium is between small and large.
That there is quite a large amount of variation between the observations.
that should read "among his large number of friends"
A large scale map shows you the distanct between things on a map and on the real eaths surface.
basket is large and bucket is small
Cl
a large elliptical galaxy
Lower ionization energy would be associated with the larger atom, as the outer most electrons would be further from the nucleus, and not held as tightly.
large atomic radii and low ionization energies
Like most high energy accelerators, the LHC begins the ionization process with Cockcroft-Walton Generators.
Francium is an alkaline metal, which means that its one electron is easily given away, making it highly reactive. Because the atom is so large, there is a shielding effect between the protons in the nucleus, and the valence electron. This blocks the attractive forces, and the other layers of electrons work to repel the valence electron, decreasing the ionization energy even further. The low ionization energy is what makes francium so reactive, that none of it can be isolated effectively.
Yes, medium is between small and large.
Ionization energy is referred to the amount of energy required to remove an electron from it's nucleus.The first ionization energy refers to the valence electron (the electron on the outer most shell)Blatantly, we can say that is requires less energy to remove valence electrons, rather than electrons in other orbitals, because it is farther away from the proton and therefore take less energy to remove that electron (ionization energy).The large discrepancy between the first and second ionization energies can be accounted for, by some of these factors:- such as shielding: basically the inner most electrons block some of the attractive forces from the nucleus (protons) and the valence electrons therefore have the most electrons blocking for them, because they are "in front" of all of the other electrons, on the outer most shell. Having this energy blocked means they are more free to move about.-Inverse square relationship between the first and Nth (n) shell: I won't write the entire equation but basically:the energy to be removed from the first shell is / by n^2, where n is the shell where the electron is removed from.Hence for the first (n=1) shellIE from 1st/ 1^2 = IE/1 = IE , this means that the energy to be removed from the first shell relative to itself is = which is true. This step is important.However, if we use the second shell (n=2), this is the second ionization energy.IE/2^2 = IE/4 , this means 4Xtimes LESS energy is needed to remove an electron from the second shell compared to the firstand then, if we use the third shell (n=3), which is the valence electron , also the FIRST Ionization energy.IE/3^2 = IE/9 , this means 9Xtimes LESS energy is needed to remove an electron from the third shell compared to the first.Conclusion: if we compare the first and second ionization energies, they are radically different from one another and there's a large discrepancy between the values due to the inverse square relationship between IE from the first energy level to the Nth level.
The group one elements have the lowest ionization energies because of their large atomic size which makes the outermost electron only weekly held by the nucleus.
The second ionization involves the removal of an electron from the outer S orbital to give a stable noble gas-like electron configuration. However, the third ionization removes an electron from the inner shell, which is much less energetically favorable.
A women's large is much narrower and shorter.
THE STRONGER THE TENDENCY TO LOSE ELECTRONS,THE MORE ELECTROPOSITIVE AND MORE METALLIC AN ELEMENT IS.SINCE BORON IS VERY SMALL AND THE FORCE OF ATTRACTION BETWEEN THE NUCLEUS AND THE VALENCE ELECTRON IS VERY HIGH,AS WELL AS LARGE VALUE OF IONIZATION POTENTIAL INDICATES THAT BORON DOES NOT HAVE THE TENDENCY TO LOSE ELECTRONS THAT IS WHY IT IS LESS ELECTROPOSITIVE AND THEREFORE IT IS A NON-METAL