Sometimes rounding won't fit your needs.
try another strategy. my old saying is to sleep on your books . (don't do that.)
yes and no. people should be able to know how to round. This is common sense, but some people still fail to do so, so this can be taken as a strategy.
Close to what it should be
You can estimate when an exact answer is not needed.
aligning compensation strategy with hr strategy and business strategy would simply mean that the designing of a company's compensation strategy should be in such a way that it should support its HR as well as business strategy.
You change all the digits to the right of the digit you are rounding to to zeros.
You change all the digits to the right of the digit you are rounding to to zeros.
It is 320.In case you think the answer should be 330, see //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rounding#Round_half_to_even
The incentive to spend should not be built into a taxation strategy.
You should use questioning strategy at all times when reading.
Yes but, if you can, you should try to round one up and the other down. Unless that results in rounding well away from the number. For example, 48*62 Exact answer = 2976 If you round 48 up to 50, 62 down to 60 Estimate = 50*60 = 3000 (estimation error = +0.8%) But if you had 48*68 Exact answer = 3264 Round up and down: 50*60 = 3000 (estimation error = -8.1% ) Round down and up: 40*70 = 2800 (estimation error= -14.2%) Round up and up: 50*70 = 3500 (estimation error = +7.2%) The last still has a large error but it is the smallest of the these.
When rounding a number, you look at the digit immediately to the right of the place you are rounding to. If that digit is 5 or greater, you round up by adding one to the digit in the rounding place. If it's less than 5, you leave the rounding place digit unchanged. All digits to the right of the rounding place become zero (if rounding to a whole number) or are dropped (if rounding to a decimal).