cause a lot of future jobs need science like botany and geologist and even studying graphs in cardiology
kirils mum
No. They should be taught in Parseltongue, yeah?
A science lesson is where science is taught.
Creationism is not science, and to teach it in science classes would be misleading. For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
Evolution is a widely accepted scientific theory supported by extensive evidence, and should be taught in science classes. Creationism, however, is based on religious beliefs and is not supported by scientific evidence, so it is not appropriate to be taught in a science classroom. It may be more suitable for discussion in courses on religion or philosophy.
Physics KineticsMechanicsElectromagneticsThermodynamicsAstronomyElectrochemistryAstrophysics BiologyAstronautics
No, evolution should be taught in science classes as it is a widely accepted scientific theory supported by evidence. Creationism, being a belief system based on faith rather than evidence, is more appropriately discussed in religious or philosophical studies. Mixing the two in a science class could blur the line between science and faith.
So you can get more smarter
When you're taught about science.
Whichever one is taught by a scientist not trained to teach.
He taught physics.
He taught physics.