Want this question answered?
To reckon means to count. Its use as a synonym for "to think" in general is non-standard.
I think you would eliminate plate counts that are not between 30-300 colonies. <30, because its too few to count, >300 too numerous to count.
1.6*s+mean and1.6*s and count numbers between them
Count 5
30
it is used to count the colonies
To reckon means to count. Its use as a synonym for "to think" in general is non-standard.
It is recommended that plates that should be counted should be between 30 and 300 McCance and Harrigan (1992). When more that 300 colonies you cant count them with great accuracy and represented with TNC ( too numerous to count). If colonies are less that 30 do you conclude that there was no bacteria in a product or food, if counting less than 20 colonies is unrealistic. Some standards are zero tolerant where even one colony means alot. So IDF (19991/1992) came up with a formula which takes in account the plates with/ even less than 30 colonies. The formula takes into account all sums of colonies obtained on the pour plates to come up with total cfus
Usually hundreds of colonies (>300) is considered as a high plate count.
Count the bars on the American flag. There is 13; one for each of the original colonies.
the 13 colonies. if you count there is 13 stripes.
The standard plate count is performed so that the number of microorganisms found in a single gram of food can be determined. To be considered standard, there needs to be a minimum of 25 colonies on the plate.
22
30-300
Because it's like impossible to count them since there's just trillions and trillions and trillions of them, so it's easier to count the number of colonies.
I think you would eliminate plate counts that are not between 30-300 colonies. <30, because its too few to count, >300 too numerous to count.
A female dog should be spayed between seasons so you should count two months from the last season.