Roman numerals weren't changed to Hindu-Arabic numerals. The two systems developed separately around the same time period. Roman numerals were in common use long after the Roman Empire collapsed in the west, right up until the 14th century, by which time the Indian base-9 positional system had evolved into a base-10 positional system and was brought to Europe by the Arabs (the system itself is not Arabic, but Indian). Mathematicians immediately took to the much simpler Hindu-Arabic system, thus Roman numerals rapidly fell from favour. The western symbols 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 were added to the Latin alphabet in the 16th century. However, the fact Roman numerals are still used today, albeit as a decorative form of ordinal notation, is testament to its longevity.
Bear in mind that Roman numerals actually are numbers, they are just not the kind of numbers that we presently use, which are called Arabic numerals. Arabic numerals were first used in Europe in the year 976 AD. Roman numerals still have not entirely fallen out of use, although for most purposes we use Arabic numerals.
In Arabic numerals, it is 616. In Roman numerals, it is DCXVI.
The equivalent Arabic numerals of the Roman numerals CC are 200
The Roman numerals of XXVIII are the equivalent of 28 in Hindu-Arabic numerals
dcccxiii in Roman numerals is equivalent to 813 in Hindu-Arabic numerals.
Yes. They are called Arabic Numerals..
1 is similar betweeen Roman and Hindu arabic numerals
Those are Roman numerals. In Arabic numerals it is 1697.
The difference between roman - numerals and hindu - arabic numerals is that the roman - numerals doesn't have zero 0
the Hindu between Arabic numerals and Roman numeral is present in.the hundu is found in Arabic numerals.
The Roman numeral XIX the same as 19 in Arabic numerals.
The Roman numerals of CCXXXVII are the equivalent of 237 in Hindu-Arabic numerals