This would depend on each individual person and how much muscle that person has built up by working out.
I would say about $12 an hour per person for normal yard work. Anythig out of the ordinary should raise this price.
There are many populations that would not likely have a normal distribution. Endangered species or unsocial animals would be such populations.
You tend to have your eyesight tested from 6 meters or 20 feet away from the chart with the letters on it. If your eyesight is 6/12 (pronounced "six over twelve"), then your eyesight is not quite normal. This is because the letters you can read from 6 meters away can be read by a normal person from 12 meters away. That is, you have to be standing twice as close. If your eyesight is 6/6 (or 20/20 in feet), you are normal. If your eyesight is 6/5, you can see from 6 feet what a normal person can only see from 5 meters away. That is, they would have to take a step towards the chart to read these letters. 20/10 would mean that you can see things clearly at 20 feet that an average person can see clearly from 10. 20/20 is the standard for good eyesight.
Generally, when we refer to the normal distribution, it is the standard, univariant normal distribution. We don't have a normal type 1, type 2, etc. However, there are closely related distributions, the truncated normal and the multivariant normal. A truncated multivariant normal would also be possible. See related links.
he would be fine! :D
they would be underweight because they would have fewer villi and it is FEWER than normal
Abscence of villi would lead to malabsorption of essential vitamins and fats. So, ideally, a person would be underweight and malnourished.
no is normal 6 would be under 8 would be fine and 9 would be over!1
Without villi in the human body, nutrient absorption in the small intestine would be greatly impaired. Villi increase the surface area for absorption, so without them, nutrients would not be efficiently absorbed into the bloodstream, leading to malnutrition and potential health issues.
no, you are just about normal. A few pounds less and you would be considered underweight!!
I'd say it's a little on the heavy side but it is within the normal range for that height and it also depends how much muscle you have. For a person with a lot of muscle that could even be considered underweight or for a person with very little or no muscle that would be overweight. Overall I'd say that's normal but as long as you FEEL normal then that's just fine.
Villi
No. I would venture to say that person is underweight. Another factor to consider is the person's gender.
It really depends on your height, and what the fat to muscle (to bone to etc) ratio of that is. For a man of average (5'8 or so) height that sounds fairly normal. For a taller person you would be leaning towards being underweight, for a shorter person more towards overweight.
You are at normal weight. A normal weight for your age and height is between 95 and 128 pounds. At 94 lbs you would be considered underweight.
While 5 stone is not a very heavy weight, it depends on the height. A tall person would be severly underweight at 5 stone, yet a very short and petite person would not be.