No because all integers are rational numbers
The square root of 27 is an irrational number
It can be written as a fraction, so it is rational. It is not an integer, whole number or irrational.
Irrational. The square root of a positive integer is either an integer, or an irrational number.
The square root of 61 is an irrational number
No because all integers are rational numbers
No. An irrational number is one that is not a rational number. A rational number is once that equals one integer divided by another. So an irrational number cannot be represented by one integer divided by another integer, so it cannot be an integer!
There is no irrational number that is also an integer.
No integer is an irrational number; all integers are rational.
-2.5 is not an integer and it's not irrational.
Every irrational number, every rational number which is not an integer and every integer less than 2 falls into this category.
The square root of 27 is an irrational number
No, a real number could also be a rational number, an integer, a whole number, or a natural number. Irrational numbers fall into the same category of real numbers, but every real number is not an irrational number.
Every irrational number, every rational number which is not an integer and every integer less than 2 falls into this category.
It can be written as a fraction, so it is rational. It is not an integer, whole number or irrational.
Unless the integer is fractional it is not an irrational number.
Irrational. The square root of a positive integer is either an integer, or an irrational number.