A rational number cannot also be irrational. A real number is either rational, or it is irrational.
yes. an irrational number is any real number that is not a rational number
3.5 is real, rational, and natural. It's not irrational, integer, or whole.
A rational number is a real number which can be expressed as a division of two integers. A real number which is not rational is called irrational. Since 3.14 = 314/100 and 314 & 100 are integers it is a rational number.
It is a real number, a rational number, an integer.
No. Every real number is not a natural number. Real numbers are a collection of rational and irrational numbers.
Integers are rational. In the set of real numbers, every number is either rational or irrational; a number can't be both or neither.
Yes every irrational and rational number is a real number.
No. It could be a rational or an irrational
The set of real numbers is defined as the union of all rational and irrational numbers. Thus, the irrational numbers are a subset of the real numbers. Therefore, BY DEFINITION, every irrational number is a real number.
Yes.
Yes.
A real number which is not a rational number is an irrational number.
Yes, every irrational number is also a real number. Real numbers include all the numbers on the number line, which consists of both rational and irrational numbers. Rational numbers can be expressed as fractions, whereas irrational numbers cannot be expressed as simple fractions. So, while all irrational numbers are real numbers, not all real numbers are irrational—some are rational.
No, a real number could also be a rational number, an integer, a whole number, or a natural number. Irrational numbers fall into the same category of real numbers, but every real number is not an irrational number.
Real numbers can be rational or irrational because they both form the number line.
It is an integer. All integers are rational but not irrational. All rational and irrational numbers are real numbers.