answersLogoWhite

0

The perimeter is in linear units (e.g. meters), and the area in square units (e.g. square meters), so you can't compare them directly.

If you insist on comparing a square unit with a linear unit - even though this has no physical significance! - it all depends on the units chosen, and the size.

A square of 1x1 has a surface area of 1 square unit, but a perimeter of 4 units. This is a counterexample to your proposition. At a size of 4x4, you reach the "break-even point"; above that, the perimeter would have a lower numerical value than the area. But please note that if you use physical measurements, the square of 1 meter x 1 meter (for example) has a perimeter of 4 meters and an area of 1 square meter (perimeter has a higher numerical value), but when you change units to centimeters, the same square has a perimeter of 400 cm, and an area of 10,000 cubic centimeters (here, the perimeter has a LOWER numerical value).

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

RossRoss
Every question is just a happy little opportunity.
Chat with Ross
ProfessorProfessor
I will give you the most educated answer.
Chat with Professor
BlakeBlake
As your older brother, I've been where you are—maybe not exactly, but close enough.
Chat with Blake

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is the perimeter always smaller than the area?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Algebra