The square root of a number is that number which, when squared, gives you the given number. For example, the square root of 25 is 5, since if you square 5, you get 25. It is the "inverse function" (that is, in a way it's the opposite) of squaring.
Finding the square root of a number is performing the opposite operation of squaring the number. In order to square a number you must multiple the number by itself. 2 x 2 = 4 so the square root of 4 is 2.
No. More frequently it is not.
The whole number between the square roots of 60 and 70 is 8. 8² = 64.
Irrational.
No, because an integer is a whole number and it's opposite (negative or positive). The square root of 80 is not a whole number.
The opposite of a square root is the square of a number. In mathematical terms, if the square root of a number x is denoted as √x, then the opposite of the square root (√x) is x itself. This is because squaring a number undoes taking the square root of that number.
Well, isn't that just a happy little question! The opposite of taking a number's square root is squaring the number. When you square a number, you multiply it by itself, which brings you back to the original number you started with. It's all about balance and harmony in the world of mathematics.
The square root of 15 is not a whole number.
The whole number closest to the square root of 65 is 8. The whole number closest to the square root of 65 is 8.
The square root of 26 is not a whole number
A perfect square root is where the square root of a number equals another whole number. For example, the square root of 144 is 12. 12 is a whole number thus 144 is a perfect square root.
The square root of 55 to the nearest whole number is 7.
Negative the square root of 36 is -6, which is a whole number.
nope! take the square root of 5, 2.236067978... which is not a whole number! hope this helps!
48 is not a square number, so the square root of 48 is irrational and can not be represented as a whole number.
If the whole number is a perfect square, its square root is rational. If not, it's not.