No. √48 = √16√3 = 4√3. √3 is not a rational number, so neither is √48.
Yes, it is the principal square root of 4, and it is rational.
The square root of 29 is an irrational number.
It is a rational number because the square root of 64 is 8 which is a rational number
It is rational because its square root can be expressed as a fracion in the form of 8/5
The square root of 48 is an irrational number because it can't be expressed as a fraction.
No. √48 = √16√3 = 4√3. √3 is not a rational number, so neither is √48.
Oh, dude, the square root of 25 is 5, which is a whole number and can be expressed as a fraction 5/1. So, yes, it is a rational number because it can be written as a ratio of two integers. But hey, who really cares about all that math stuff anyway, right?
No, the square root of 1000 is not rational.
is the square root of 3 rational
The square root of 4 is 2. 2 is a rational number so they square root of 4 is rational.
No, the square root of 1500 is not a rational number.
It is rational. The root of a perfect square, such as 4, is rational; the root of any positive integer that is not a perfect square is an irrational number.
[ square root of (4.1) ] is irrational. But [ square root of (4) ] is rational.
Yes, it is the principal square root of 4, and it is rational.
Yes, it is the principal square root of 4, and it is rational.
The square root of 225 is 15, which is a rational number.