answersLogoWhite

0

7.071678118.......

rounded to

7.1

*****

To a whole lot of places, it's actually 7.0710678118654752440084436210485...

But no finite number of places can be enough to establish its irrationality.

Certainly, √50 is indeed irrational. Here is how we can see that it is so:

First of all, we note that √50 = 5√2.

To show that the above is irrational, we need to show two things:

(1) that √2 is irrational; and

(2) that the product of a integer and an irrational is irrational.

We show (1), above, by reductio ad absurdum: We assume the opposite of that which we wish to prove and show that it entails a contradiction.

Suppose that √2 is rational. Then it must equal the quotient p/q, where p and q are two integers that are relatively prime. In particular, not both, p and q may be even numbers.

(√2 might also equal some p'/q', where p' and q' have a common divisor greater than 1; but, in that case, the fraction could be reduced to p/q. Thus, we can assume, without loss of generality, that p and q are relatively prime; that is, that p/q is irreducible.)

Before continuing our proof, we shall need to establish the following: The square of every even integer is an even integer; and the square of every odd integer is an odd integer.

Let n be even; thus, n = 2k, where k is some integer. Then, n2 = 4k2; thus, n2 is divisible by 4 and, therefore, it is also divisible by 2.

Let m be odd; thus, m = 2j + 1.

Then m2 = (2j + 1)2 = 4j2 + 4j + 1 = 2(2j2 + 2j) + 1, which is evidently odd.

We may conclude, from the above, that, if a perfect square is an even integer, then its square root must also be even. Now, we may continue the main proof:

From √2 = p/q, which we assumed above, p and q being relatively prime, we deduce the following:

p2 = 2q2; therefore, p2 is even; therefore, p is even.

Because p is even, p = 2r, for some integer r. Then, p2 = 4r2 = 2q2; thus, q2 = 2r2, and q is similarly shown to be even. P and q, therefore can not be relatively prime.

But, wait! Our assumption was that p and q are relatively prime and can not both be even; and, so, we have the contradiction we sought.

Therefore, (1) is proved, and there exist no integers p and q, such that p/q = √2, and p/q is an irreducible fraction. In other words, √2 must, after all, be irrational.

Now, we proceed to show (2), that the product of an integer and an irrational is irrational; it will suffice to do this by means of the example in hand: namely, that, if √2 is irrational, then √50 = 5√2 must also be irrational.

First, we know that the sum of two integers is also an integer; likewise, by induction, the product of two integers is an integer. From this, we can show that the product of two rationals is also a rational:

Let the two rationals be a/b and c/d, where a, b, c, and d are all integers. Then, their product is ac/bd, and, because ac and bd are integers, ac/bd must, by definition, be rational.

Multiplying both sides by 1/5, we obtain (1/5)(√50) = √2.

Now, 1/5 is rational; then, if √50 is rational, then √2, being the product of two rationals, must also be rational. But we have shown, in (1) above, that √2 is not rational.

We conclude that √50 can not be rational, either; therefore, it is irrational, which is what we set out to prove.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

MaxineMaxine
I respect you enough to keep it real.
Chat with Maxine
BlakeBlake
As your older brother, I've been where you are—maybe not exactly, but close enough.
Chat with Blake
TaigaTaiga
Every great hero faces trials, and you—yes, YOU—are no exception!
Chat with Taiga

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is the square root of 50 a irrational number?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp