It is a real number, a rational number, an integer.
No. The square root of a positive integer can only be an integer, or an irrational number.
Irrational. The square root of a positive integer is either an integer, or an irrational number.
The square root of 61 is an irrational number
The square root of 27 is an irrational number
Since 95 is positive, its square root is real. Only negative numbers have non-real square roots. That leaves the question of whether it is rational or irrational. An integer's square root can only be rational if it is itself an integer. But 95 is not a perfect square, so it's square root is not an integer. Therefore the square root is irrational.
Integer, rational, and real.
It is a real number, a rational number, an integer.
No. The square root of a positive integer can only be an integer, or an irrational number.
No, the square root of an integer will not always be an integer. It may or may not be. The square root of nine is three, both of which are integers. The square root of two is not an integer. In fact, it is not even a rational number.
No, it is not.The square root of any positive integer is eitheran integer orirrational
No. The square root of an integer is always either an integer or an irrational number.
Irrational. The square root of a positive integer is either an integer (that is, if the integer is a perfect square), or an irrational number.
Yes because the square root of a 100 is 10 which is a rational number
No, it isn't. Any square root of an integer is either an integer itself, or irrational.
No. The square root of an integer is either an integer, or an irrational number.
For a start, the square root of any integer is either an integer, or an irrational number.