The proof is by the method of reductio ad absurdum.
We start by assuming that 5 + sqrt(3) is rational.
The set of rational numbers is close under addition (and subtraction)
So, subtracting 5 (or adding -5) gives another rational number.
That is 5 + sqrt(3) - 5 is rational
Therefore sqrt(3) must be rational.
That means that it can be expressed in the form p/q where p and q are co-prime integers.
Thus sqrt(3) = p/q.
This can be simplified to 3*q^2 = p^2
Now 3 divides the left hand side (LHS) so it must divide the right hand side (RHS).
That is, 3 must divide p^2 and since 3 is a prime, 3 must divide p.
That is p = 3*r for some integer r.
Then substituting for p gives,
3*q^2 = (3*r)^2 = 49*r^2
Dividing both sides by 3 gives q^2 = 3*r^2.
But now 3 divides the RHS so it must divide the LHS.
That is, 3 must divide q^2 and since 3 is a prime, 3 must divide q.
But then we have 3 dividing p as well as q which contradict the requirement that p and q are co-prime.
The contradiction implies that sqrt(3) cannot be rational.
yes.
The square root of 3 is an irrational number
The square root of -3 is an imaginary number and the square root of 3 is an irrational number that can't be expressed as a fraction
The square root of 3 is an irrational number
Sometimes it is and sometimes it isn't. The square root of 2 and the square root of 3 are both irrational, as is their product, the square root of 6. The square root of 2 and the square root of 8 are both irrational, but their product, the square root of 16, is rational (in fact, it equals 4).
Because 3 is a prime number and as such its square root is irrational
yes.
It is known that the square root of an integer is either an integer or irrational. If we square root2 root3 we get 6. The square root of 6 is irrational. Therefore, root2 root3 is irrational.
Yes, the sqrt of (3+5) is irrational, because: sqrt(3+5) = sqrt of 8, which is irrational
The square root of 3 is an irrational number
YES.... squre root of 3 is in irrational number..
The square roots of 2 and 3 are irrational but not transcendent.
It is irrational.
The square root of -3 is an imaginary number and the square root of 3 is an irrational number that can't be expressed as a fraction
Yes. For example, the square root of 3 (an irrational number) times the square root of 2(an irrational number) gets you the square root of 6(an irrational number)
There are infinitely many irrational numbers between sqrt(2) and sqrt(3).
This is an easy question : root 2, root 3, root 5. Any square root of an integer which is not integral itself is irrational.