Fast, the past tense of must is not musted. Must does not have a simple past tense, in its place "Had to" is used in most cases.
NO!!! It is the past tense of the verb 'to have'. Present tense I have You have He/she/they have Past Tense I Had You had He/she/they had Future Tense I shall have You will have He/she/they will have Not the use of 'shall/will'
Solved is the past tense of solve.
stidiedhas studied because this leaves a sense of present tense where as will study is future tense and had studied is past tense and to put stuied is a simlpe form of the past tense.
Have is not a "to be" verb. Present tense forms of be: am/is/are Past tense forms of be: was/were Being is the present participle, and been is the past participle.
Yes it is.
false.
The past participle of "must" is "musted."
False is an adjective and so doesn't have a past tense. Only verbs have tenses.
You can use "had to" to express obligation in the past.
The past tense of must is should have
Falsify is verb form of false. Present tense--I/we/you/they falsify, he/she/it falsifies. The past tense and past participle is falsified; the present participle is falsifying.
'Had visited' is past tense. You can see this because visit is the present tense so visited must be past tense. Also, the word 'had' is often used in the past tense.
"Must" doesn't have a past form. You can use "had to" to talk about obligation in the past.
Were. They are reading They were reading
Yes. 'was' is a past tense of 'is', and 'is' is a verb and so 'was' must be a verb.
To change the past tense and past participle of a verb, you must either change the verb back to its present tense or get rid of its suffix.
The palindrome for the past tense of "do" is "did." It reads the same forwards and backwards.