The lowest common multiple of 7 and 9 is greater than 40.
They are 40 and 40
Answer:2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18,20,22,24,26,28,30,32,34,36,38,40,42,44,46,48,50,52,54,56,58,60,62,64,66,68,70,72,74,76,78, 80,82,84,86,88,90,92,94,96,98,100
4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40
all you have to do is follow the same algorithm for adding a pair of fractions together. the main step is to find common denominators between the two. to do this, you need to find the least common multiple. another way you could find a common denominator is just by changing them into decimals, and adding them normally like whole numbers with the decimals lined up correctly.
Division Ladders are useful for finding Greatest Common Factors, also known as Greatest Common Divisors. If your math problem is to find the GCF of 32, 24 and 40 using a Division Ladder, you would find the answer thusly: 2 |32, 24, 40 , |_________ 2 |16, 12, 20 , |________ 2 | 8, 6, 10 , |________ , 4, 3, 5 You would be dividing by 2 in this case, then multiply your divisors, 2 x 2 x 2 = 8. Your Greatest Common Factor for 32, 24 and 40 is 8. I used the commas for placeholders, as without them, the vertical lines don't line up.
There is no highest common multiple. Whatever common multiple you come up with as being their highest common multiple, I can always add their lowest common multiple (120) to get a higher common multiple.
There is no greatest common multiple - whatever common multiple you come up with as the greatest one I can add their lowest common multiple (45162) and get an even higher multiple. There is a greatest common factor, which for 3474 and 26 is 2.
There is no greatest common multiple. Whatever value you may come up with, I can always add their lowest common multiple (72) to get a higher common multiple.
96 is the only common multiple of 24 and 32 up to 100.
There is really no such thing as a "greatest common multiple". Once you find the least common multiple of a set of numbers, you can keep adding the LCM to itself over and over again. Each new number you get will be a common multiple of your set of numbers, but each new number will always be larger than the previous. This means that you can keep adding while the number approaches infinity and you will still never find a greatest multiple.
Multiple failures or a common failure causing multiple problems.Multiple failures or a common failure causing multiple problems.
Because a greatest common multiple would (in theory) be infinity. The multiples would simply keep going up and up and up forever.
56 is a multiple of 7, and 56 is also a multiple of itself, so 56 isthe least common multiple of both numbers.There is no greatest common multiple. Whatever multiple you name,no matter how large it is, I can always add 56 to it and come up witha larger one.
Any number between 1 and 50 can be a common multiple.
There is no greatest common multiple of two (or more) numbers: whatever number you come up with as the greatest common multiple I can always add their lowest common multiple to get an even higher common multiple. If you meant the LOWEST common multiple (the least number that both divide into with a remainder) then lcm(72, 180) = 360. If you meant the greatest common FACTOR (the greatest number that divides into both), then gcf(72, 180) = 36.
for small numbers, say 8 and 10, multiply up the 8 until the 10 will divide into it, so 8,16,24,32,40 40 divides by 10 so lcm of 8 and 10 is 40 and is the lowest number they both divide into, for larger numbers use prime factoring, find on google / lcm / least common multiple-wikipedia / scroll to finding least common multiple by factorization
There is no highest common multiple of 14 and 16. Whatever common multiple you come up with as the highest I can always add the lowest common multiple of 14 and 16 (122) to it and get a higher common multiple of 14 and 16.