Oh, dude, the ratio of two integers is just one number divided by the other. As long as the denominator isn't zero (because you can't divide by zero, like, ever), you're good to go. So, like, if you have 8 divided by 2, the ratio is 4. Easy peasy!
There is none
No - because it can be represented as a ratio of integers : 81 = 81/1 Any number that can be represented as a ratio of 2 integers is classified as a rational number (other than that you can't use 0 for the denominator)
It is not, for it is equal to 66666/1, which is the ratio of two integers.
No - because it can be represented as a ratio : 7.51 = 751/100 Any number that can be represented as a ratio of 2 integers is classified as a rational number (other than that you can't use 0 for the denominator)
Rational numbers are equivalent to ratios of two integers (the denominator being non-zero). A ratio is a relationship between two set of values. For example, the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter is pi, which is not a rational number.
It is a rational fraction.
It is a fraction in rational form.
A ratio with denominator 0 is not defined.
And the denominator is 0
The ratio is not defined.
It is not defined.
It is not defined.
There is none
When expressed as a ratio of two integers (not intergers!), the simplest form for the integer but not others, has 1 as the denominator.
The requirement for a number to be a rational number is that it can be expressed as a ratio of two integers, where the denominator does not equal zero.
An improper fraction has the numerator equal to or greater than the denominator.
It is a rational fraction.