yes and no because if it zero wouldn't it be a whole number or a improper fraction with a 1 under the numerator
If the denominator is 0 then the fraction is undefined.
When one or both of the integers is/are zero.a*b=0 if a=0, b=0, or both a and b are equal to 0. In other words, if one or both integers are zero.
The integers less than or equal to 2 are: {2, 1, 0, -1, -2, -3, ...}
2/9 is rational by definition- it is a ratio of two integers.
A ratio with denominator 0 is not defined.
It is not defined.
The denominator cannot be 0 because division by 0 is not defined.
It is a rational fraction.
The ratio of two integers is a fraction that represents the division of one integer by another. As long as the denominator is not equal to zero, the ratio is defined. For example, the ratio of 4 to 2 is 4/2, which simplifies to 2.
A ration with 2 integers and has a denominator of 0 would be called rational numbers. This is taught in algebra.
No - because it can be represented as a ratio of integers : 81 = 81/1 Any number that can be represented as a ratio of 2 integers is classified as a rational number (other than that you can't use 0 for the denominator)
No - because it can be represented as a ratio of integers : 10 = 10/1 Any number that can be represented as a ratio of 2 integers is classified as a rational number (other than that you can't use 0 for the denominator)
yes and no because if it zero wouldn't it be a whole number or a improper fraction with a 1 under the numerator
If the denominator is 0 then the fraction is undefined.
No - because it can be represented as a ratio : 7.51 = 751/100 Any number that can be represented as a ratio of 2 integers is classified as a rational number (other than that you can't use 0 for the denominator)
No - because it can be represented as a ratio : 8.01=801/100 Any number that can be represented as a ratio of 2 integers is classified as a rational number (other than that you can't use 0 for the denominator)