It is not defined.
yes and no because if it zero wouldn't it be a whole number or a improper fraction with a 1 under the numerator
If the denominator is 0 then the fraction is undefined.
Yes, 0.133333333 is a rational number. A rational number is any number that can be expressed as a fraction where both the numerator and denominator are integers. In this case, 0.133333333 can be written as the fraction 4/30, which simplifies to 2/15. Since 2/15 is a fraction with integers in both the numerator and denominator, 0.133333333 is a rational number.
When one or both of the integers is/are zero.a*b=0 if a=0, b=0, or both a and b are equal to 0. In other words, if one or both integers are zero.
The integers less than or equal to 2 are: {2, 1, 0, -1, -2, -3, ...}
A ratio with denominator 0 is not defined.
It is not defined.
The denominator cannot be 0 because division by 0 is not defined.
It is a rational fraction.
A ratio of two integers where the denominator is non-zero can be expressed as ( \frac{a}{b} ), where ( a ) is the numerator and ( b ) is the denominator. For example, if ( a = 4 ) and ( b = 2 ), the ratio is ( \frac{4}{2} ), which simplifies to 2. It's important to ensure that the denominator ( b ) is not zero, as division by zero is undefined.
A ration with 2 integers and has a denominator of 0 would be called rational numbers. This is taught in algebra.
Oh, dude, the ratio of two integers is just one number divided by the other. As long as the denominator isn't zero (because you can't divide by zero, like, ever), you're good to go. So, like, if you have 8 divided by 2, the ratio is 4. Easy peasy!
No - because it can be represented as a ratio of integers : 10 = 10/1 Any number that can be represented as a ratio of 2 integers is classified as a rational number (other than that you can't use 0 for the denominator)
No - because it can be represented as a ratio of integers : 81 = 81/1 Any number that can be represented as a ratio of 2 integers is classified as a rational number (other than that you can't use 0 for the denominator)
yes and no because if it zero wouldn't it be a whole number or a improper fraction with a 1 under the numerator
If the denominator is 0 then the fraction is undefined.
No - because it can be represented as a ratio : 8.01=801/100 Any number that can be represented as a ratio of 2 integers is classified as a rational number (other than that you can't use 0 for the denominator)