The x coordinate in the second quadrant is negative while the y coordinate is positive.
-1
The first graph consists of all points whose coordinates satisfy the first equation.The second graph consists of all points whose coordinates satisfy the second equation.The point of intersection lies on both lines so the coordinates of that poin must satisfy both equations.
Substitute the x coordinate into the equation for x and calculate y. If the formla gives the same y value as the coordinates, the point is on the line. If it is diffent, it is not on the line.
The first number in an ordered pair (of rectangular coordinates) is the distance from the origin along the x- axis. If the number is 0, then any point having this coordinate must lie on the y-axis. If the second number is 0 then the point is at the origin (0,0). If the second number is positive then the point lies on the y-axis above the origin. If the second number is negative then the point lies on the y-axis below the origin.
(0, -3) is not in any quadrant. I lies on the border between two quadrants. Because zero is not positive or negative, it cannot be defined as in a quadrant
It lies in quadrant I.
Both coordinates are negative in this case.
The coordinates of (-1, 3) lie in the 2nd quadrant on the Cartesian plane
Well, it could lie in Quadrant 1,2,3,4.
-1
The coordinates of a point are in reference to the origin, the point with coordinates (0,0). The existence (or otherwise) of an angle are irrelevant.
If x = 0 then the point is on the y-axis and so it not in any quadrant.
A point lies on a line if the coordinates of the point satisfy the equation of the line.
If you mean the point of (-1, 6) then it lies in the 2nd quadrant on the Cartesian plane
(0-5) lies in First Quadrant
The first graph consists of all points whose coordinates satisfy the first equation.The second graph consists of all points whose coordinates satisfy the second equation.The point of intersection lies on both lines so the coordinates of that poin must satisfy both equations.
In general, any point that falls on the axes, is not considered to be in any quadrant. This answer is used in most HS texts since it is simple and "works." However, you can define things so that a point with a single zero coordinate will either (1) be common to the two adjacent quadrants, or (2) be part of one and only one quadrant. Here is how to do the second choice. associate the positive x-axis with quadrant I, the positive y-axis with quadrant II, the negative x-axis with quadrant III, and the negative y-axis with quadrant IV. Then what do we do about (0,0)? This is why the first answer works and if most often used. The other possibilities are only mentioned so you can see they exists.