developing a plan and then implementing the plan
True
100
It is not always the best method, sometimes elimination is the way you should solve systems. It is best to use substitution when you havea variable isolated on one side
No. Sometimes they are both extraneous.
perimeters will always be length so we have units of lenght such as mm, inch, feet etc. NOT area, so no square feet or square yards etc.
it is not always problem solving
There are many limitations that mathematical models have as problem solving tools. There is always a margin of error for example.
They are positive thinkers, never a moment passes when they are convinced they can not do it. Redefining the problem to better solve it is a part is protocol. And lastly they always have a plan, a process. Such as analysis, proposition, planning to start.
Absolutely, if you have good common sense. The problem with that though, is many people who have absolutely no common sense think they do. But real common sense, if present, is the best problem solver of all.
With computers there are always going to be problems that need solving, if something stops working, you have to find out what the possible situation is, test the situation and then record what happens, with more experience it becomes faster because you have done this before and it will save alot of time because you can cut many stages.
No because you always keep an equation in balance when solving it
I've always used Emerald Latex Gloves, and I've never had a problem.
Using unorthodox methods is not always wrong.
She was known for her brainy approach to problem-solving that always impressed her colleagues.
You could talk about how you always see potential problems as an opportunity. You can say you especially welcome the opportunity to turn an unhappy customer into a customer for life by solving their problem.
It's always been effective and will always remain effective
A number must always be followed by it's correct unit.