0
What else can I help you with?
Is rather than a preposition or a conjunction?
The pair together may be either.Than is a preposition. It isn't used to join two statements that could each be a sentence in their own rights. Rather is an adverb that must be followed by than; it says that it would be preferable for you to do the first option than the second and has the same effect when put before rather as when put after the verb. So rather than followed by a noun can be a preposition meaning "instead of" (e.g. potatoes rather than rice, stayed rather than going home).However, the pair "rather than" can also connect an infinitive clause (rather than a gerund), acting as a conjunction as in the example,"Rather than continue the argument, he walked away."
Use rather in a sentence?
I would rather spend a nice day at the park than go to work.
When is the median used rather than the mean?
The question will specify.
Why is a bulb brighter when it is powered by 2 batteries rather than 1?
it has more energy than one bulb
What shape a coin is?
It is a cylinder since it has three bases of measurement rather than the two that a circle has.
How did Julius casar contribute to the breakdown of the roman republic?
Julius Caesar contributed to the breakdown of the republic in several ways. He started a civil war, he appointed the consuls rather than have them elected, and he retained the position of dictator far longer than necessary.Julius Caesar contributed to the breakdown of the republic in several ways. He started a civil war, he appointed the consuls rather than have them elected, and he retained the position of dictator far longer than necessary.Julius Caesar contributed to the breakdown of the republic in several ways. He started a civil war, he appointed the consuls rather than have them elected, and he retained the position of dictator far longer than necessary.Julius Caesar contributed to the breakdown of the republic in several ways. He started a civil war, he appointed the consuls rather than have them elected, and he retained the position of dictator far longer than necessary.Julius Caesar contributed to the breakdown of the republic in several ways. He started a civil war, he appointed the consuls rather than have them elected, and he retained the position of dictator far longer than necessary.Julius Caesar contributed to the breakdown of the republic in several ways. He started a civil war, he appointed the consuls rather than have them elected, and he retained the position of dictator far longer than necessary.Julius Caesar contributed to the breakdown of the republic in several ways. He started a civil war, he appointed the consuls rather than have them elected, and he retained the position of dictator far longer than necessary.Julius Caesar contributed to the breakdown of the republic in several ways. He started a civil war, he appointed the consuls rather than have them elected, and he retained the position of dictator far longer than necessary.Julius Caesar contributed to the breakdown of the republic in several ways. He started a civil war, he appointed the consuls rather than have them elected, and he retained the position of dictator far longer than necessary.
Why did the Romans want the Republic to have two consuls of rather than one?
The Romans established the system of two consuls in order to prevent one man from gaining supreme power over them.The Romans established the system of two consuls in order to prevent one man from gaining supreme power over them.The Romans established the system of two consuls in order to prevent one man from gaining supreme power over them.The Romans established the system of two consuls in order to prevent one man from gaining supreme power over them.The Romans established the system of two consuls in order to prevent one man from gaining supreme power over them.The Romans established the system of two consuls in order to prevent one man from gaining supreme power over them.The Romans established the system of two consuls in order to prevent one man from gaining supreme power over them.The Romans established the system of two consuls in order to prevent one man from gaining supreme power over them.The Romans established the system of two consuls in order to prevent one man from gaining supreme power over them.
Is there a leader of Ancient Rome's government?
Ancient Rome had three types of leaders. In the time of the Roman Kingdom, it had a King; in the time of the Roman Republic, it had two Consuls for the majority of the time, and a Dictator in times of emergency; and in the time of the Roman Empire, it had figures now generally referred to as 'emperors', who held various titles (i.e. Augustus and Princeps).
Why did the Romans adopt a republic rather than a democracy for their government?
Their territory was too large to govern by democracy
Why did the Romans have two consuls rather than one?
With 1 consul, they can make themselves dictators and Rome did not want that to happen. With 3, two could side against one and it could get unbalanced. With 2, one can veto the other and stop them from doing bad, hopefully balancing each other's weaknesses.
Who are th government officials of roman republic?
The government officials of the Roman republic are starting from the top: Consul--top man, two of them Praetor--mainly a judge, but had other duties as well. Number changed over time Quaestor--treasury offiial, number changed over time Aedile--in charge of public works. Number changed over time. Censor--oversaw the rolls of citizenship every five years. Could remove people from the senate, if deemed unworthy. Tribune--plebeian official who had power of veto over everyone except a dictator. Originally two, but grew to ten.
Who gave the roman military orders?
The Roman military was given orders by their generals, their consuls or their emperor, depending on the times. Technically the consuls were in charge of the military, but the leadership of the various legions was delegated to the generals or the legates of the legion. To complicate matters further, the troops swore their oaths of allegiance to their generals during the republic, so it was the generals who the troops obeyed rather than the consuls. Augustus changed all this by establishing the principate and having the military swear their allegiance to him, as emperor.The Roman military was given orders by their generals, their consuls or their emperor, depending on the times. Technically the consuls were in charge of the military, but the leadership of the various legions was delegated to the generals or the legates of the legion. To complicate matters further, the troops swore their oaths of allegiance to their generals during the republic, so it was the generals who the troops obeyed rather than the consuls. Augustus changed all this by establishing the principate and having the military swear their allegiance to him, as emperor.The Roman military was given orders by their generals, their consuls or their emperor, depending on the times. Technically the consuls were in charge of the military, but the leadership of the various legions was delegated to the generals or the legates of the legion. To complicate matters further, the troops swore their oaths of allegiance to their generals during the republic, so it was the generals who the troops obeyed rather than the consuls. Augustus changed all this by establishing the principate and having the military swear their allegiance to him, as emperor.The Roman military was given orders by their generals, their consuls or their emperor, depending on the times. Technically the consuls were in charge of the military, but the leadership of the various legions was delegated to the generals or the legates of the legion. To complicate matters further, the troops swore their oaths of allegiance to their generals during the republic, so it was the generals who the troops obeyed rather than the consuls. Augustus changed all this by establishing the principate and having the military swear their allegiance to him, as emperor.The Roman military was given orders by their generals, their consuls or their emperor, depending on the times. Technically the consuls were in charge of the military, but the leadership of the various legions was delegated to the generals or the legates of the legion. To complicate matters further, the troops swore their oaths of allegiance to their generals during the republic, so it was the generals who the troops obeyed rather than the consuls. Augustus changed all this by establishing the principate and having the military swear their allegiance to him, as emperor.The Roman military was given orders by their generals, their consuls or their emperor, depending on the times. Technically the consuls were in charge of the military, but the leadership of the various legions was delegated to the generals or the legates of the legion. To complicate matters further, the troops swore their oaths of allegiance to their generals during the republic, so it was the generals who the troops obeyed rather than the consuls. Augustus changed all this by establishing the principate and having the military swear their allegiance to him, as emperor.The Roman military was given orders by their generals, their consuls or their emperor, depending on the times. Technically the consuls were in charge of the military, but the leadership of the various legions was delegated to the generals or the legates of the legion. To complicate matters further, the troops swore their oaths of allegiance to their generals during the republic, so it was the generals who the troops obeyed rather than the consuls. Augustus changed all this by establishing the principate and having the military swear their allegiance to him, as emperor.The Roman military was given orders by their generals, their consuls or their emperor, depending on the times. Technically the consuls were in charge of the military, but the leadership of the various legions was delegated to the generals or the legates of the legion. To complicate matters further, the troops swore their oaths of allegiance to their generals during the republic, so it was the generals who the troops obeyed rather than the consuls. Augustus changed all this by establishing the principate and having the military swear their allegiance to him, as emperor.The Roman military was given orders by their generals, their consuls or their emperor, depending on the times. Technically the consuls were in charge of the military, but the leadership of the various legions was delegated to the generals or the legates of the legion. To complicate matters further, the troops swore their oaths of allegiance to their generals during the republic, so it was the generals who the troops obeyed rather than the consuls. Augustus changed all this by establishing the principate and having the military swear their allegiance to him, as emperor.
What 3 men formed the first triumvirate rule rome?
The three men were Crassus Pompey and Caesar. The first triumvirate was an informal political alliance which controlled Roman politics, rather than rule Rome, as the Roman Republic was headed by two annually elected consuls.
Where the Romans from greeke?
Were the Romans from Greece? No, they were from Rome, which is a city of Italy. Hence, Romans rather than Greeks.
How did the Romans finally change their governemnt after 200 years of harsh monarchic rule?
The Roman monachy was not a hostory of 244 years of harsh rule. Only its last king was a tyrant. The Romans overthrew the last Roman king in a rebellion in 509 BC because he was a tyrant. They decided to do away with the monarchy and establish a republic to prevent the return of tyranny. Monarchy became associated with tyranny. They created the Roman Republic, which was headed by two annually elected consuls. Having two men in charge meant that they could counterbalance each other. The short term of office ensured that no one could concentrate power in his hands and thus become a tyrant. The Romans also swore that they would not let anyone try to become a king. Trying to become a king was the worst possible accusation .In the 5th century BC one man was killed and his house destroyed and in the 4th century BC another man was executed because of accusations of trying to become a king.
Texas became better known as the what rather than the republic of Texas?
Texas became better known as the "REGION", rather than the republic of Texas.
Why did the roman's want a republic?
The political thinking of the time was that the Romans never wanted to be subject to the whims and orders of a one man rule. They established the republic to avoid this and to give the people a voice in how they were governed. This concept is reflected in the USA which has since creation been a republic rather than a democracy.
