No by definition a decimal number can never be an integer because an integer is a whole number (it can not have any decimal parts).
It is neither because it is a decimal number and integers are whole numbers without decimals or fractions.
0.030 is not an integer. So there would be no integer for it.
The number 28500 is an integer, so it is 28500.0000... . The zeros to the right mean it is an integer. The three dots mean the zeros continue forever (ad infinitude). If the number is not an integer, like 3 3/4, change the 3/4 to a decimal and add to 3: 3/4=.75, 3 3/4=3.75.
Well, honey, an integer is a whole number without any decimal or fraction. So, 0.9 is not an integer because it has a decimal point and a fraction part. It's as simple as that, darling.
A non-positive integer is any integer that is less than or equal to zero. This includes all negative integers (such as -1, -2, -3, etc.) as well as zero itself. In mathematical notation, non-positive integers are represented as { ..., -3, -2, -1, 0 }.
No.
-0.8 would not be an integer because it is a decimal and decimals are not integers. An integer is a whole number negative or positive.
A decimal number is not an integer. An integer is a number that is not a fraction, and decimal numbers are decimal fractions.
No, an integer is a whole number, meaning it would have nothing after the decimal point.
No, if it has a decimal place then its not an integer
Nowhere. 10000 is an integer and requires no decimal number.
an integer won't have any decimal point
75 is an integer, not a fraction. As a decimal it is 75, exactly as in the question.
A decimal is not an integer. However a number with a decimal component can be either positive or negative
Yes. A mixed decimal is any decimal with an integer ... i.e. 7.38. .38 is the decimal 7 is the integer
An integer is a number that has no decimal. Yes, 184 is an integer.
No.