No by definition a decimal number can never be an integer because an integer is a whole number (it can not have any decimal parts).
0.030 is not an integer. So there would be no integer for it.
It is neither because it is a decimal number and integers are whole numbers without decimals or fractions.
The number 28500 is an integer, so it is 28500.0000... . The zeros to the right mean it is an integer. The three dots mean the zeros continue forever (ad infinitude). If the number is not an integer, like 3 3/4, change the 3/4 to a decimal and add to 3: 3/4=.75, 3 3/4=3.75.
Well, honey, an integer is a whole number without any decimal or fraction. So, 0.9 is not an integer because it has a decimal point and a fraction part. It's as simple as that, darling.
A non-positive integer is any integer that is less than or equal to zero. This includes all negative integers (such as -1, -2, -3, etc.) as well as zero itself. In mathematical notation, non-positive integers are represented as { ..., -3, -2, -1, 0 }.
No.
-0.8 would not be an integer because it is a decimal and decimals are not integers. An integer is a whole number negative or positive.
A decimal number is not an integer. An integer is a number that is not a fraction, and decimal numbers are decimal fractions.
No, an integer is a whole number, meaning it would have nothing after the decimal point.
No, if it has a decimal place then its not an integer
Nowhere. 10000 is an integer and requires no decimal number.
an integer won't have any decimal point
75 is an integer, not a fraction. As a decimal it is 75, exactly as in the question.
A decimal is not an integer. However a number with a decimal component can be either positive or negative
Yes. A mixed decimal is any decimal with an integer ... i.e. 7.38. .38 is the decimal 7 is the integer
An integer is a number that has no decimal. Yes, 184 is an integer.
No.