0
What else can I help you with?
What is the difference between inductive an deductive method?
Deductive reasoning is sometimes referred to as a "top down" approach, in other words deductive reasoning works from the more general to the more specific. It often starts with a theory and is then narrowed down to an actual, testable hypothesis, that can be confirmed or denied by observation. Inductive reasoning is the inverse approach, a "bottom up" approach. It begins with an observation and through observation patterns and regularities are observed and can be applied to a more generalized theory.
Inductive reasoning is empirical in nature which means that it is based on and observations on the real world?
Inductive reasoning involves drawing general conclusions from specific observations or evidence gathered from the real world. This empirical approach allows for the formulation of theories and hypotheses based on patterns and trends observed in data. Unlike deductive reasoning, which tests specific cases against established theories, inductive reasoning seeks to build broader understanding from tangible experiences and observed phenomena. As a result, it plays a crucial role in scientific inquiry and everyday decision-making.
Compare normative deductive and inductive approaches to theory formulation which approach is more useful in theory construction-?
Normative deductive approach starts with a theory and uses deduction to derive hypotheses, while inductive approach starts with observations and uses induction to formulate a theory. The deductive approach is useful when researchers have a strong theoretical foundation and want to test specific hypotheses, while the inductive approach is useful when exploring new areas where little theory exists. The usefulness of each approach depends on the research question and context.
What Deductive reasoning is much better than inductive reasoning.?
Deductive reasoning involves drawing specific conclusions from general principles or premises, leading to more certain outcomes compared to inductive reasoning, which involves drawing general conclusions from specific observations. Deductive reasoning follows a top-down approach, moving from the general to the specific, and is commonly used in mathematics and formal logic to guarantee valid conclusions.
What type of reasoning does qualitative research use?
Qualitative research primarily uses inductive reasoning, which involves starting with specific observations or data points and then developing general conclusions or theories based on those observations. This approach allows researchers to explore deeper meanings, perspectives, and relationships within their data.
What is the method of reasoning that involves using speceific facts to form a conclusion?
The method of reasoning that involves using specific facts to form a conclusion is known as inductive reasoning. This approach starts with particular observations or instances and builds towards a general conclusion or theory. While inductive reasoning can suggest likely outcomes, the conclusions drawn are not guaranteed to be universally true, as they rely on the accuracy and representativeness of the initial facts.
What is the method of reasoning that involves using specific facts a conclusion?
The method of reasoning that involves using specific facts to reach a conclusion is known as inductive reasoning. This approach starts with particular observations or examples and formulates broader generalizations or theories based on those specific instances. While inductive reasoning can lead to probable conclusions, it does not guarantee certainty, as the conclusion may not hold true in all cases.
A form of reasoning called is the process of forming general ideas and rules based on your experiences and observations?
A form of reasoning called _____________ is the process of forming general ideas and rules based on your experiences and observations induction
What is the differences between inductive and deductive approaches to research theory?
Inductive approach involves generating theories based on observations and patterns identified in the data, while deductive approach tests existing theories against empirical evidence. Inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to broader generalizations, whereas deductive reasoning moves from general principles to specific predictions. Both approaches are used in scientific research to build knowledge and test hypotheses.
Francis Bacon created a new way of scientific thinking called inductive reasoning. How was this different from the deductive reasoning of earlier eras?
Francis Bacon's inductive reasoning emphasizes drawing general conclusions from specific observations and experiments, moving from particular instances to broader generalizations. In contrast, deductive reasoning, which was prominent in earlier eras, starts with general principles or theories and derives specific conclusions from them. This shift in approach allowed for a more empirical method of scientific inquiry, prioritizing observation and experimentation over established dogma. Ultimately, Bacon's inductive reasoning laid the groundwork for the modern scientific method.
What is Decided cases of inductive legal reasoning?
Decided cases of inductive legal reasoning refer to legal decisions that establish general principles or rules based on specific instances or examples. In this approach, judges analyze a series of prior cases, identifying patterns or commonalities, to draw broader legal conclusions or precedents. This method contrasts with deductive reasoning, where conclusions are derived from general laws applied to specific facts. Inductive reasoning plays a crucial role in the evolution of legal doctrines as it reflects how law adapts to new circumstances and societal changes.
Compare normative deductive and inductive approaches to theory formulation which approach is more useful in theory construction?
Normative deductive approaches start with a general theory and apply it to specific cases, while inductive approaches start with observations and work towards general principles. Normative deductive approaches are more useful in theory construction as they allow for testing and refinement of theories based on observable data, whereas inductive approaches may lead to biased generalizations.
