0
What else can I help you with?
What is the difference between inductive an deductive method?
Deductive reasoning is sometimes referred to as a "top down" approach, in other words deductive reasoning works from the more general to the more specific. It often starts with a theory and is then narrowed down to an actual, testable hypothesis, that can be confirmed or denied by observation. Inductive reasoning is the inverse approach, a "bottom up" approach. It begins with an observation and through observation patterns and regularities are observed and can be applied to a more generalized theory.
Compare normative deductive and inductive approaches to theory formulation which approach is more useful in theory construction-?
Normative deductive approach starts with a theory and uses deduction to derive hypotheses, while inductive approach starts with observations and uses induction to formulate a theory. The deductive approach is useful when researchers have a strong theoretical foundation and want to test specific hypotheses, while the inductive approach is useful when exploring new areas where little theory exists. The usefulness of each approach depends on the research question and context.
What Deductive reasoning is much better than inductive reasoning.?
Deductive reasoning involves drawing specific conclusions from general principles or premises, leading to more certain outcomes compared to inductive reasoning, which involves drawing general conclusions from specific observations. Deductive reasoning follows a top-down approach, moving from the general to the specific, and is commonly used in mathematics and formal logic to guarantee valid conclusions.
What type of reasoning does qualitative research use?
Qualitative research primarily uses inductive reasoning, which involves starting with specific observations or data points and then developing general conclusions or theories based on those observations. This approach allows researchers to explore deeper meanings, perspectives, and relationships within their data.
A form of reasoning called is the process of forming general ideas and rules based on your experiences and observations?
A form of reasoning called _____________ is the process of forming general ideas and rules based on your experiences and observations induction
What is the differences between inductive and deductive approaches to research theory?
Inductive approach involves generating theories based on observations and patterns identified in the data, while deductive approach tests existing theories against empirical evidence. Inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to broader generalizations, whereas deductive reasoning moves from general principles to specific predictions. Both approaches are used in scientific research to build knowledge and test hypotheses.
Francis Bacon created a new way of scientific thinking called inductive reasoning. How was this different from the deductive reasoning of earlier eras?
Francis Bacon's inductive reasoning emphasizes drawing general conclusions from specific observations and experiments, moving from particular instances to broader generalizations. In contrast, deductive reasoning, which was prominent in earlier eras, starts with general principles or theories and derives specific conclusions from them. This shift in approach allowed for a more empirical method of scientific inquiry, prioritizing observation and experimentation over established dogma. Ultimately, Bacon's inductive reasoning laid the groundwork for the modern scientific method.
Compare normative deductive and inductive approaches to theory formulation which approach is more useful in theory construction?
Normative deductive approaches start with a general theory and apply it to specific cases, while inductive approaches start with observations and work towards general principles. Normative deductive approaches are more useful in theory construction as they allow for testing and refinement of theories based on observable data, whereas inductive approaches may lead to biased generalizations.
What reasoning that uses specific observations to make generalizations called?
The reasoning that uses specific observations to make generalizations is called inductive reasoning. This approach involves drawing broader conclusions based on a set of specific instances or evidence. For example, observing that the sun has risen in the east every day leads to the generalization that the sun always rises in the east. Inductive reasoning is often used in scientific research to formulate hypotheses and theories based on collected data.
Who scientific work relied on observationexperimentand inductive reason?
The scientific work of Sir Francis Bacon relied heavily on observation, experimentation, and inductive reasoning. He is often regarded as the father of the scientific method, advocating for a systematic approach to inquiry that emphasizes empirical evidence and the collection of data through experiments. Bacon's ideas laid the groundwork for modern scientific practices, encouraging scientists to draw general conclusions from specific observations. His emphasis on inductive reasoning marked a significant shift from the deductive reasoning prevalent in earlier scientific thought.
What scientific work relied on observation experiments and inductive reasoning?
One prominent scientific work that relied on observation experiments and inductive reasoning is Charles Darwin's "On the Origin of Species." Darwin meticulously observed variations in species during his voyage on the HMS Beagle, particularly in the Galápagos Islands. He collected data on different finch species and their beak shapes, leading him to formulate the theory of natural selection based on the patterns he observed. This approach exemplified inductive reasoning by deriving general principles from specific observations.
How do you use deductive approach?
Deductive reasoning is "process of elimination." The character Sherlock Holmes defines it thusly: "When you eliminate the impossible, what is left -- no matter how improbable -- must be the truth."
