answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Descartes' dualism stated that the mind and body were distinct and occupied different planes of reality. A monism theory of reality believes that there is only one reality, and would state that the mind and body are connected. Pluralism believes that there are many realities, not just two, so the mind and body might be distinct, but there would also be other planes of reality.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Discuss Rene Descartes' metaphysical dualism as opposed to both monism and pluralism?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Art & Architecture

What is Ryle's criticism of Descartes dualism?

Ryles criticized Descartes dualism theory stating that the philosopher made a categorical error with the mind. Ryles believed that we controlled the processes of our thought patterns and it was not a separate entity.


Did descartes believe that the mind and body were linked together?

Descartes believed that the nature of the mind was completely separate from the nature of the body. This concept formed the dualism philosophy.


What are the contributions of Rene Descartes in psychology?

The field of psychology looks at the relationship between the physical body and the way that our mind works. Descartes helped bridge that gap between science and philosophy in his exploration of mind body dualism theory, especially in his last work, "Passions of the Soul".


What are the 10 characteristics of modern philosophy?

Ch1. Faction in the 20th Century - Analytic Philosophy vs. Continental PhilosophyIt should be well known to a modern student of philosophy that house currently stands somewhat divided on itself. In England and America, analytic philosophy in the tradition of Russell and others dominates. It has essentially taken over. But in the 20th century we saw the rise of philosophers rejecting "scientism", particularly in continental Europe. Names like Husserl, Kierkegaard and Sartre stand out prominently as examples of philosophers not plugged into the American/English tradition.2. Modern LogicBetween great thinkers like Frege, Gödel, Tarski, Kripke and Quine, in the 20th century we developed an unparalleled understanding of philosophical and mathematical logic. Model theory remains a hot topic in mathematical and philosophical circles. A basic understanding of the nature of incompleteness and completeness is becoming standard for student of philosophy and computer science. With the advance of logic philosophy over all has become a more formal discipline.3. Thinking in Terms of LanguageMuch of modern linguistics has philosophical fathers. Frege and Grice spring to mind, a strong case could also be made for Tarski. But the architect of a takeover of language analysis in the 20th century was Wittgenstein. His Philosophical Investigationslead philosophers to the idea that by analyzing so called language games, we could solve paradoxes and understand the world. This was something of a pre-occupation of philosophers in the 20th century.4. Epistemology - Empiricism vs. Rationalism before the 20th centuryThe early modern philosophers were deeply concerned with questions of epistemology. History class usually breaks them up into two approaches. One approach put "self-evident" truths into the center stage. This approach is called rationalism. The other approach put sense data as the primary source of knowledge. This approach is known as empiricism. The subject of many treatises has been based on argument for one side against another. Some of the great rationalist of history are Descartes and Leibniz. Some of the great empiricists are Hume and Locke. It is worth mentioning that Kant argued against rationalism on the basis of arguments with equal a priori support, which he dubbed "antinomies".5. Philosophy of GovernmentThe idea of what makes a good government takes center stage from the enlightenment all the way to modern day. Hobbes, Rousseau, Locke, John Stuart Mill, Karl Marx, Robert Nozick and John Rawls are just a few names in a long, rich history of political philosophers. It might be worth mentioning that enthusiastic readers of author Ayn Rand, who go under the self-proclaimed name of Objectivists count themselves as political philosophers (as well as philosophers of epistemology and ethics). As of right now, most philosophy departments ignore Objectivists.6. Science - What is it? What is Causality? What is a Scientific Explanation?In the 20th century, the philosopher Karl Popper raised the question "What makes something scientific?" and argued that Freudian psychology and Marxism are not scientific modes of thought, but that relativity, which were cutting edge at the time, is. His arguments were based on a principle of "falsifiability", namely that in order for some hypothesis to be scientific, it must be falsifiable. Other philosophers have grappled with the subject of causality, the earliest account I can think of in the 20th century belonging to Hume. Still others such as Hempel grappled with the notion of what is an explanation, giving rise to the idea of a Deductive-Nomological account of scientific explanation. Modern philosophers of science include Nancy Cartwright and Bas van Fraassen.7. Modern Epistemology - Justified True BeliefThe subject of epistemology has been hot and remains hot throughout all of Modern philosophy. I have already mentioned some of the classical approaches to epistemology, namely rationalism and empiricism. The modern approach barrows from the seminal critique of modern epistemology by Edmund Gettier. Read up more on "Gettier cases" if you are curious. Much of epistemology is devoted to the question of "What makes a belief justified?"; but also shares topics in ontology (namely the question, "What is true?") and philosophy of mind (namely the subject, "What is a belief?"). A pioneer in our modern theory of knowledge would be W.V. Quine, who suggests that beliefs form webs with peripheries we are more likely to abandon in the face of conflicting evidence and cores we would essentially never abandon.8. Ethics - Cognitive ( Utility vs. Obligation) vs. Non-CognitiveIn the 20th century the field of Meta-Ethics was formed, to answer the question "What is ethics anyway?" An early name in this subject was G.E. Moore. Essentially the question is split between ideas that ethical truths can be discerned objectively somehow, versus the idea that ethical statements mean "something else". An early Cognitivist contrast to Moore was the philosopher W.D. Ross, who gives the idea of candidate duties one must decide between in situations of seeming conflict of duty, or as he calls them prima facia duties. The Non-Cognitivist philosopher Ayer did not believe that there was any way of resolving ethical disputes. The Non-Cognitivist philosopher Stevenson thought that ethical statements were supposed to evince another person of some position.9. Philosophy of MindAnother subject and perennial question of modern philosophy is "What is the thought?" The discussion almost always starts with Descartes Meditations. The view is typically split between Materialism, which holds that thoughts can be explained in terms of matter, and Dualism, which holds that thoughts can be explained in terms other worldly matter. Almost all 20th century analytic philosophers reject this view.10. Rationality and EconomyEver since Adam Smith, we have been interested in asking what motivates people in economies, and what is best. A closely related question is "What is rationality". I will be honest, this subject matter is the focus of my study. Great reading can be found classically in Malthus and Hobbes and Smith, great modern reading would be in Von Neumman & Morgenstern, Luce & Raiffa, Kripke, David Lewis, Auman, Kreps, Rubinstein, Amartia Sen, Schelling and Kahneman to mispell a few names off the top of my head.


Related questions

What is the difference between descartes dualism and sankhya dualism?

nksgdksdgsdksgdksjdk


Does the word Cartesian in Cartesian Dualism derive from Descartes and if not then from where?

yes


Why did Rene Descartes disagree with the concept of dualism?

she wuz on meth


What is Ryle's criticism of Descartes dualism?

Ryles criticized Descartes dualism theory stating that the philosopher made a categorical error with the mind. Ryles believed that we controlled the processes of our thought patterns and it was not a separate entity.


Did descartes believe that the mind and body were linked together?

Descartes believed that the nature of the mind was completely separate from the nature of the body. This concept formed the dualism philosophy.


What is the Concept of Dualism?

The concept of dualism is that immaterial 'mind' is superior over material body. Western dualism = THEORETICAL division of sense reality in man-made 'civilized' society and wilderness, in metaphysical and physical, 'good' and 'evil, 'science' and 'intuition'. Resulting in Priests of Science in universities


What does Cogito Ergo Sum mean and what conclusion does it leave Descartes with?

The one thing that Descartes couldn't doubt was his thoughts, he thinks there for he is. To be a good philosopher, you need to be skeptical (to ask a lot of questions), Descartes asked questions then doubted them. That brought in dualism. He is considered one of the greatest thinkers of the enlightenment period.


What are Descartes beliefs?

Rene Descartes is most noted for his important work in both mathematics and philosophy. His most important philosophical work was the concept of Dualism, or the idea that the body and soul are separate parts of the person.


What are the contributions of Rene Descartes in psychology?

The field of psychology looks at the relationship between the physical body and the way that our mind works. Descartes helped bridge that gap between science and philosophy in his exploration of mind body dualism theory, especially in his last work, "Passions of the Soul".


What are 2 division of philosophy?

dualism and non-dualism,...


When was Dualism - album - created?

Dualism - album - was created on 2011-09-23.


What is the Dualism in Indian Economy?

Dualism is economic and social divisions of an economy. The social dualism in India is the coexistence of advanced science, superstitions and the cost system. Technical dualism in India is the Green Revolution in the top 10% of their rural population. Geographical dualism is the labor migration, capital movements and trade.