321 is an integer, so the closest integer would be 321. (If 321 itself doesn't count, 322 and 320 are the same distance from it, and are the next closest.)
There is no "integer for -8", but the integer with equivalent magnitude to -8 is 8
The closest integer to the left of 4.7 on the number line is 4. Since 4.7 is closer to 5 than it is to 4, the integer to the left of 4.7 is 4. This is because integers are whole numbers without any decimal or fractional parts, so the closest integer to the left of 4.7 is 4.
-132
No - an integer is a whole number - the closest integers to 12.5 are 12 and 13.
321 is an integer, so the closest integer would be 321. (If 321 itself doesn't count, 322 and 320 are the same distance from it, and are the next closest.)
No - 0.8 is a decimal number, not an integer. The closest integer is 1.
There is no "integer for -8", but the integer with equivalent magnitude to -8 is 8
It is 18 or 20
There is no "integer for -8", but the integer with equivalent magnitude to -8 is 8
The closest integer to the left of 4.7 on the number line is 4. Since 4.7 is closer to 5 than it is to 4, the integer to the left of 4.7 is 4. This is because integers are whole numbers without any decimal or fractional parts, so the closest integer to the left of 4.7 is 4.
You can't write a non-integer as an integer. You can round it to the closest integer if you like, but it's not exactly the same number.
-132
12
You would round it to 25.
Just between you and me, 8 IS an integer.
0.2 is the closest that you will get. The nearest integer, though, is 0.