Amir says all numbers that end in a 4 are multiples of 4 is he correct explain how you know?

Answer 1

Well, bless Amir's heart, but he's a bit off the mark on this one. Just because a number ends in 4 doesn't mean it's a multiple of 4. Take 14 for example, it ends in 4 but it's not a multiple of 4. So, Amir's claim is as accurate as saying a hot dog is a vegetable because it has ketchup on it.

Answer 2

Amir is incorrect. Not all numbers ending in 4 are multiples of 4. For a number to be a multiple of 4, it must be divisible by 4 without leaving a remainder. While numbers ending in 4 may sometimes be multiples of 4, this is not always the case. For example, 14 ends in 4 but is not a multiple of 4.

Answer 3

Oh, dude, Amir is like totally wrong. Just because a number ends in 4 doesn't mean it's a multiple of 4. Like, 14 ends in 4 but it's not a multiple of 4. You can like totally prove this by showing numbers that end in 4 but aren't divisible by 4, like 14, 24, 34, and so on.

Answer 4

He is not correct. I know because I have found a counter-example.

14 is not a multiple of 4. (Neither is 34, 54, 74, 94, or 114.) QED

Amir is wrong. His hypothesis does not hold water.