Yes, e.g. 3 and 5 are relatively prime, 27 (33) and 25 (52) are relatively prime...
They are not relatively prime. To be relatively prime, the only common factor they could have would be the number 1. Both also have the number 3 as a common factor, so they are not relatively prime.
No.
Two numbers are relatively prime if the only factor they have in common is 1. Example: 12 and 17 are relatively prime because they have only 1 as a common factor. 12 and 21 are not relatively prime because they have 1 and 3 as common factors.
Two numbers are relatively prime if the only factor they have in common is 1. The factors of 12 are 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 12. The factors of 25 are 1, 5, and 10. The only factor they have in common is 1, so they are relatively prime.
No, they are not relatively prime.
Yes, 33 and 56 are relatively prime.
The GCF is 33, which means they are not relatively prime.
Yes.
No, 12 and 15 aren't relatively prime, because they both share as a prime factor 3. Dividing both12 and 15 by 3 gives 4 and 5 respectively. Consecutive numbers are always coprime. Coprime numbers are relatively prime to each other, as they share no prime factors, for example 33 and 35,
Yes, e.g. 3 and 5 are relatively prime, 27 (33) and 25 (52) are relatively prime...
Yes, they are relatively prime.
Yes, they are relatively prime.
Yes, e.g. 3 and 5 are relatively prime, 27 (33) and 25 (52) are relatively prime...
12 and 30 are not relatively prime because they have two common prime factors (2 and 3).
1 It is a relatively prime number.
12 and 35 are NOT prime numbers.