answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Rational zero test cannot be used to find irrational roots as well as rational roots.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Can the rational zero test be used to find irrational roots as well as rational roots?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Can a integer be irrational?

yes it can be i had it on a test and got it rightAnswer:No, integers cannot be irrational. Any number that is rational is, by definition, not irrational. Any number that can be expressed as a fraction composed of integers is rational. All integers can be expressed as a fraction (and thus are rational) because they can all be expressed as themselves divided by 1.


what are all of the zeros of this polynomial function f(a)=a^4-81?

Find All Possible Roots/Zeros Using the Rational Roots Test f(x)=x^4-81 ... If a polynomial function has integer coefficients, then every rational zero will ...


Is there a way to know a whole number radicand makes the number irrational?

No. For small radicands you can test the radical to see if it is rational. But for very large numbers it may not be simple and may even be impractical.


What is the rational root theroem?

In algebra, the rational root theorem (or rational root test, rational zero theorem or rational zero test) states a constraint on rational solutions (or roots) of a polynomialequationwith integer coefficients.If a0 and an are nonzero, then each rational solution x, when written as a fraction x = p/q in lowest terms (i.e., the greatest common divisor of p and q is 1), satisfiesp is an integer factor of the constant term a0, andq is an integer factor of the leading coefficient an.The rational root theorem is a special case (for a single linear factor) of Gauss's lemmaon the factorization of polynomials. The integral root theorem is a special case of the rational root theorem if the leading coefficient an = 1.


Is 1.1 rational or irrational?

1.1 is the ratio of 11 to 10. It's rational. rational comes from the word ratio, so if the number can be expressed as a ratio of one whole number divided by another whole number than it is a rational number. 11/10 is a rational number. when trying to decide if a number is rational or irrational (like on a test), often its hard to know right away if the number could be expressed as a ratio of two whole numbers. so here is another clue. an irrational number can never be written out entirely. not only does the number go on forever, but it goes on forever with a sequence of numbers that never repeats. so if you can write the entire number (like 1.01, or 1.000000001) or if the number repeats, (like .33 or .1428) then it is rational. in fact, if the number is written with a decimal point than you know its rational. because they cannot be written out entirely, irrational numbers have to be expressed as a square root of another number, or one number raised to a fractional power (any power that is not a whole number) all the rules summed up 1) number is a fraction (ei 1/3, 4/7, 16/2) - rational 2) number is written out (ei 1,2,3.0, 9.09, 1.00003) - rational 3) number is not completely written out but repeats (ei .33 or .1428) - rational 4) number is a square root of a square number (square numbers are 1,4,9,16,25,36,49, etc)- rational 5) number is a square root of a non-square number (non square numbers are all numbers except 1,4,9,16,25,36,49, etc)- irrational 6) number is rational number taken to a power that is a whole number - rational 7) number is any number taken to a power that is not a whole number - irrational


What supreme court will uphold a law concerning a given group as long as the law is it reasonably related to a legitimate government interest?

Apex-type question, reworded to preserve answer


What test measures whether an action of the government achieves a fair purpose?

The rational basis test


What test measures whether an action of government achieves a fair purpose?

The rational basis test


What is the solution to x7-9x4 plus 3x2 plus 3 using synthetic division?

Your question looks like: x7 - 9x4 + 3x2 + 3. This problem cannot be solved using synthetic division alone--you need to know what to divide by. There are some ways to find possible solutions to try dividing by (Rational Roots Test & Descartes' Rule of Signs), but I've done that for this problem, and none of the solutions are rational. I feel like you left out part of the question.


Laws that include suspect classifications must pass what test in order to be constitutional?

The rational basis test


Laws that include suspect classifications must pass which test in order to be constitutional?

The rational basis test.


What does R.F.Ts test stand for?

Rational Functional Tester Jim www.RefinanceRight.org