Because of the Richter scale's logarithmic properties, a number 5 earthquake is 100 times more severe than a number 3 earthquake.
The term strongest does not really apply here. It really depends on the context. -30 is much colder than -2, so in this case the more negative, the "stronger" the implication. If we were talking about a bank balance, $5 is better than $1, so here the more positive number is the "stronger" one. Just think of negative and positive numbers as all living on the same spectrum, but just on different sides of zero, or what we use to denote the absence of anything.
A sleep number bed costs about as much as a regular bed
5,000/mm3.
This would depend on how much you are rounding to. If you are rounding to the nearest hundred then the answer could be a number like 66048. However, if you are rounding to the nearest 1 then the answer could be a number like 66000.4.
How much Would $100 in 1920
A LOT stronger. The force of an earthquake is expressed using a log 10 scale of energy. A 5.0 earthquake is 10 times stronger than a 4.0, a 6.0 is 10 times stronger than a 5.0, and so on. 9 is the highest number on the scale, and would be a "Great" earthquake, as opposed to minor, moderate, strong or major. Total destruction of man-made structures, etc.
If you mean how stronger a 7.9 earthquake is then a 4.6 earthquake, then a 7.9 earthquake is way stronger. It can take down buildings but then again so can a 4.6, still you've sorter got you're answer. But the 7 in 7.9 means 700 and the 0.9 is 90 so baisically your question is: How stronger is a 790 earthquake from a 460 earthquake?
An 8.3 earthquake is significantly stronger than a 6.6 earthquake. Each whole number increase on the Richter scale represents a tenfold increase in the amplitude of seismic waves, meaning an 8.3 earthquake releases exponentially more energy than a 6.6 earthquake.
An 8.8 earthquake is approximately 63 times stronger than a 7.0 earthquake in terms of energy release. The Richter scale is logarithmic, so each whole number increase represents a tenfold increase in amplitude and a 31.6 times increase in energy release.
No, the Richter or Moment Magnitude scale is logarithmic, meaning that each whole number increase represents approximately 31.6 times more energy release. Therefore, an 8.0 earthquake releases about 1000 times more energy than a 4.0 earthquake.
400 Times ___________________ The above may very well be correct; my understanding is that every whole number up represents about a 10-fold increase in energy of a quake. One would conclude that the quake of rating 8 is 10,000 times stronger than a quake of 4. ___________________ 10,000 times is the correct answer
A 7.1 earthquake is approximately 10 times stronger in terms of energy release compared to a 7.0 earthquake. The Richter scale is logarithmic, meaning each whole number increase represents a tenfold increase in amplitude and roughly 31.6 times more energy released.
A magnitude 8 earthquake is 1,000 times stronger than a magnitude 6 earthquake in terms of energy released. It can cause significantly more damage and have a larger impact on structures and the environment.
The Chile earthquake at 8.8 was about 100 times stronger than the Haiti earthquake at 6.8. The Richter scale is logarithmic. The difference between the earthquakes is 2.0, which is the logarithm of 100.
Well the 1946 earthquake to my knowledge was 8.0 in magnitude but the 20010 was was only 7.0 so in fact the 1946 earthquake was stronger, but the media coverage may not have been as large which is why people may be under the illusion that the 2010 earthquake was stronger, it is one of the positive consequences of the Internet transmitting information that we can learn about these disasters quicker to send help especially to less economically developed countries.
The magnitude of an earthquake is measured on a logarithmic scale, so a magnitude 7.0 earthquake is 10 times stronger than a magnitude 6.0 earthquake in terms of the energy released. This means that the amplitude of ground shaking in a magnitude 7.0 earthquake would be significantly greater than in a magnitude 6.0 earthquake.
Cats would be much much stronger if we would be as small as them