no - 0.333333 is 333333/1000000, which is the ratio of two integers, the denominator not being zero, and that meets the definition of a rational number. Also, 0.333333, with the 3's repeating forever is 1/3, also a rational number.
yes
Yes.
yes
It must be a generalised rational number. Otherwise, if you select a rational number to multiply, then you will only prove it for that number.
A terminating or repeating decimal is rational. .333333...=1/3 5.09090909=509090909/100000000
no - 0.333333 is 333333/1000000, which is the ratio of two integers, the denominator not being zero, and that meets the definition of a rational number. Also, 0.333333, with the 3's repeating forever is 1/3, also a rational number.
There are infinitely many pairs of number. Let A be any number and let B = A + 333333.Then B - A = A + 333333 - A = 333333.Since The choice of A is arbitrary so A could be any one of infinitely many numbers. Therefore, there are infinitely many solutions.
It is a rational number. It can be written as a fraction.
yes
.333333 is not an integer. An integer is a whole number like 1, 2, 3...
Is 12.05 a rational number or irrational number?
1.96 is a rational number
It is a rational number, as it can be written as a fraction.
Yes, the sum is always rational.
There is no such thing as a number that is both rational and irrational. By definition, every number is either rational or irrational.
As much as, in these days of uncertainty, anything can be anything. As long as the constraints of a rational number are kept to, a rational number will always remain a rational number.