Technically, no. A rational number can be defined as a fraction, and that is 1333/1000. However, 1.333....., as you might mean, is an irrational number because there are infinite decimals, so it cannot be written as a fraction.
yes
Yes.
yes
It must be a generalised rational number. Otherwise, if you select a rational number to multiply, then you will only prove it for that number.
Technically, no. A rational number can be defined as a fraction, and that is 1333/1000. However, 1.333....., as you might mean, is an irrational number because there are infinite decimals, so it cannot be written as a fraction.
The sum is: 1333 km
1333 and 1/3
It is a rational number. It can be written as a fraction.
yes
Is 12.05 a rational number or irrational number?
1.96 is a rational number
It is a rational number, as it can be written as a fraction.
Yes, the sum is always rational.
There is no such thing as a number that is both rational and irrational. By definition, every number is either rational or irrational.
As much as, in these days of uncertainty, anything can be anything. As long as the constraints of a rational number are kept to, a rational number will always remain a rational number.
Yes, it is.