148 is an integer and not a fraction. However, it can be expressed in rational form as 148/1. You can then calculate equivalent rational fractions if you multiply both, its numerator and denominator, by any non-zero integer.
yes
Yes.
yes
It must be a generalised rational number. Otherwise, if you select a rational number to multiply, then you will only prove it for that number.
All integers are RATIONAL, since they can be written as a fraction with denominator 1; in this case: -148 / 1.
148 is an integer and not a fraction. However, it can be expressed in rational form as 148/1. You can then calculate equivalent rational fractions if you multiply both, its numerator and denominator, by any non-zero integer.
It is a rational number. It can be written as a fraction.
yes
Is 12.05 a rational number or irrational number?
1.96 is a rational number
It is a rational number, as it can be written as a fraction.
Yes, the sum is always rational.
There is no such thing as a number that is both rational and irrational. By definition, every number is either rational or irrational.
As much as, in these days of uncertainty, anything can be anything. As long as the constraints of a rational number are kept to, a rational number will always remain a rational number.
Yes, it is.
10.01 is a rational number