Yes, 2.33 is a rational number because it can be expressed as a fraction of two integers. In this case, 2.33 can be written as 233/100, which is the ratio of two integers. Rational numbers are numbers that can be expressed as a ratio of two integers, where the denominator is not zero.
yes
Yes.
By itself and one because 233 is a prime number
yes
It must be a generalised rational number. Otherwise, if you select a rational number to multiply, then you will only prove it for that number.
233 is an integer and not a fraction. However, it can be expressed in rational form as 233/1. You can then calculate equivalent rational fractions if you multiply both, its numerator and denominator, by any non-zero integer.
233
It is a rational number. It can be written as a fraction.
233 + 1 = 234
It is: 1 times 233 = 233 which is a prime number
yes
Is 12.05 a rational number or irrational number?
1.96 is a rational number
It is a rational number, as it can be written as a fraction.
Yes, the sum is always rational.
There is no such thing as a number that is both rational and irrational. By definition, every number is either rational or irrational.
As much as, in these days of uncertainty, anything can be anything. As long as the constraints of a rational number are kept to, a rational number will always remain a rational number.