8.3 and 8.26 are both rational numbers. Their sum is 16.56. That's also a rational number. Their difference is 0.04. That's also a rational number. Their product is 68.558. That's also a rational number. Their quotient is close to 0.9952. It can't be completely written as a decimal, but it's equivalent to 413/415 and it's a rational number too.
yes
Yes.
yes
It must be a generalised rational number. Otherwise, if you select a rational number to multiply, then you will only prove it for that number.
-415 is an integer and not a fraction. However, it can be expressed in rational form as -415/1 which cannot be simplified.
8.3 and 8.26 are both rational numbers. Their sum is 16.56. That's also a rational number. Their difference is 0.04. That's also a rational number. Their product is 68.558. That's also a rational number. Their quotient is close to 0.9952. It can't be completely written as a decimal, but it's equivalent to 413/415 and it's a rational number too.
The number 415 is spelled as "four hundred fifteen."
No. 415 = 5*83
All multiples of 415, which is an infinite number.
415 is 126% of 329.37
415 is a perfectly valid decimal number. So the answer is 415 inches.
415 is not a prime number. Any number that only has itself and one as factors is a prime number. Therefore, since 5 and 83 are factors of 415 that makes it a composite number (not prime).
It is a rational number. It can be written as a fraction.
They are all composite and rational numbers
yes
Is 12.05 a rational number or irrational number?