Oh, dude, you're hitting me with the math questions. Okay, so a rational number is any number that can be expressed as a fraction, right? And 6.28 can totally be written as 628/100, which is a fraction, so yeah, it's a rational number. But like, who even uses fractions these days anyway?
In mathematics, the concept of a "ring" refers to a specific algebraic structure. The number 628 being on a ring does not inherently imply that it is a real number. In the context of rings, elements can be integers, rational numbers, complex numbers, or other mathematical objects, but the term "real" typically refers to a subset of numbers on the real number line. Therefore, without additional context or clarification, it is not accurate to conclude that 628 being on a ring means it is a real number.
yes
Yes.
It must be a generalised rational number. Otherwise, if you select a rational number to multiply, then you will only prove it for that number.
yes
It is not. It is the rational number 6.28 = 628/100.
In mathematics, the concept of a "ring" refers to a specific algebraic structure. The number 628 being on a ring does not inherently imply that it is a real number. In the context of rings, elements can be integers, rational numbers, complex numbers, or other mathematical objects, but the term "real" typically refers to a subset of numbers on the real number line. Therefore, without additional context or clarification, it is not accurate to conclude that 628 being on a ring means it is a real number.
It is a rational number. It can be written as a fraction.
yes
Is 12.05 a rational number or irrational number?
1.96 is a rational number
It is a rational number, as it can be written as a fraction.
Yes, the sum is always rational.
There is no such thing as a number that is both rational and irrational. By definition, every number is either rational or irrational.
(650) 628-4322
As much as, in these days of uncertainty, anything can be anything. As long as the constraints of a rational number are kept to, a rational number will always remain a rational number.
Yes, it is.