If it can't be expressed as a fraction then it is an irrational number
You use a negative rational number when an answer is below zero.
0.1 is equivalent to 1/10 which is a rational number
No. A negative number is a number below zero, not zero itself.The number zero is neither negative nor positive.
There weren't any numbers given below.
See related link below
You use a negative rational number when an answer is below zero.
0.1 is equivalent to 1/10 which is a rational number
Complement of a Set: The complement of a set, denoted A', is the set of all elements in the given universal set U that are not in A. In set- builder notation, A' = {x ∈ U : x ∉ A}. The Venn diagram for the complement of set A is shown below where the shaded region represents A'.Rational number, in arithmetic, a number that can be represented as the quotient p/q of two integers such that q ≠ 0. In addition to all the fractions, the set of rational numbers includes all the integers, each of which can be written as a quotient with the integer as the numerator and 1 as the denominator.Consider Q and Qc, the sets of rational and irrational numbers, respectively: x∈Q→x∉Qc, since a number cannot be both rational and irrational. So, the sets of rational and irrational numbers are complements of each other.
It is -8.
No, numbers less than 0.833 are not always irrational. For instance, 0.2 isn't an irrational number
The answer depends on what the irrational number is!
You use a negative rational number when an answer is below zero.
I linked a good resource that explains what you asked below.
A googleplex. It's a 1 with a hundred zeros. NO. A googol (not google) is 1 followed by 100 zeros. A googolplex is 1 followed by a googol zeros. In any case, neither is the largest rational number. There cannot be a largest rational number since one more than that is going to be bigger. But there are some numbers that have been used in serious mathematical studies and that do have names which are far larger. See, for example the wikipedia entry for large numbers (link below).
I can see no rational expression below.
No way to really draw a Venn diagram with WikiAnswers. My sad attempt is below. I also included a link which does have a nice Venn diagram. So have a look below and click on the link. +-------------------------------------------+ | Complex | | +---------------------------------------+ | | | Imaginary | | | +---------------------------------------+ | | | | +---------------------------------------+ | | | R Irrational | | | +-E-------------------------------------+ | | | A Rational | | | | L +--------------+-+--------------+ | | | | | Integer | | | | | | |Whole | | | | | | | | Natural | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Negative |0| Positive | | | | | +--------------+-+--------------+ | | | +---------------------------------------+ | +-------------------------------------------+
No. A negative number is a number below zero, not zero itself.The number zero is neither negative nor positive.