Many odd numbers are divisible by 3. 3 itself for example, as well as 9, 15, 21, 27, ... Being odd and being divisible by three are not related.
NO. Odd numbers are not always divisible by 5. Examples: 3 , 7, 9, 11, 13, 17, ... are odd numbers and they are not divisible by 5.
Yes.Additional Information:If you have two consecutive numbers, one of them will be an odd number and the other will be an even number. Since even numbers are divisible by 2, the only even prime number is 2. If two consecutive numbers are prime, the even number must be 2. So, because 1 is not a prime number, the only time that two consecutive numbers can be prime is in the case of 2 and 3.
133,135,137,139
4225
No, the sum of two consecutive numbers is always an odd number, and is not divisible by two.
Yes, that is true.
All odd numbers are the sum of two consecutive numbers. Odd multiples of 7 less than 25 are 7 and 21.
The sum of three consecutive odd numbers must be divisible by 3. As 59 is not wholly divisible by 3 the question is invalid. PROOF : Let the numbers be n - 2, n and n + 2. Then the sum is 3n which is divisible by 3. If the question refers to three consecutive numbers then a similar proof shows that the sum of these three numbers is also divisible by 3. Again, the question would be invalid.
There are no two consecutive odd numbers.
There is no solution. You could do it if the numbers were odd: 25 and 27 are consecutive odd numbers that equal 52.
Yes, if the first number is odd.
150/160
The GCF of consecutive odd numbers is 1.
Consecutive whole numbers will have an odd sum. Consecutive odd numbers, or consecutive prime numbers, will be 29 and 31.
Odd numbers are not divisible by even numbers.
No odd numbers are divisible by even numbers.