500 and 480 respectively.
Yes, if you are rounding to the nearest hundred. No, if you are rounding to the nearest ten.
194 rounds to 190 if you are rounding to the nearest ten, and to 200 if you are rounding to the nearest hundred.
That would depend on what you were rounding it to. If rounding to the nearest whole number, then it does not need rounding. If rounding to the nearest ten, it would be 420. If rounding to the nearest hundred, it would be 400.
670 rounded to the nearest hundred is 700. 670 rounded to the nearest hundred is 1000.
363 rounded to the nearest hundred is 400. When rounding to the nearest hundred, you round up if you are at the halfway point or above (50), and round down if below. 363 rounded to the nearest ten is 360. When rounding to the nearest ten, you round up if you are at the halfway point or above (5), and round down if below.
The answer will depend on the degree of rounding. To the nearest ten or hundred (or more) the answer is ZERO.To the nearest integer it is 2.The answer will depend on the degree of rounding. To the nearest ten or hundred (or more) the answer is ZERO.To the nearest integer it is 2.The answer will depend on the degree of rounding. To the nearest ten or hundred (or more) the answer is ZERO.To the nearest integer it is 2.The answer will depend on the degree of rounding. To the nearest ten or hundred (or more) the answer is ZERO.To the nearest integer it is 2.
If rounding to the nearest ten: 795 If rounding to the nearest hundred: 750
In whole numbers, rounding to the nearest ten is better. And in decimals, rounding to the nearest hundreth is more accurate.
Yes, if you are rounding to the nearest hundred. No, if you are rounding to the nearest ten.
Rounding to the nearest hundredth is more accurate.
97 will have the same result when rounded to the nearest ten or hundred.
194 rounds to 190 if you are rounding to the nearest ten, and to 200 if you are rounding to the nearest hundred.
Yes, if you were rounding to the nearest ten. No, if you were rounding to the nearest hundred.
There is no universal "better". Rounding off is a trade-off between reducing the accuracy and simplifying calculations. Also, if there are other numbers in an addition that are rounded to the nearest hundred, there is no point in rounding your number to the nearest ten.
That would depend on what you were rounding it to. If rounding to the nearest whole number, then it does not need rounding. If rounding to the nearest ten, it would be 420. If rounding to the nearest hundred, it would be 400.
If you are rounding to the nearest one, it is 999.5 . If you are rounding to the nearest ten, it is 995. If you are rounding to the nearest hundred, it is 950. If you are rounding to the nearest thousand, it is 500.
670 rounded to the nearest hundred is 700. 670 rounded to the nearest hundred is 1000.