85
No you cannot. You might want to try the factor tree for 27.
Every composite number has its own unique tree, so I guess the answer is all numbers have one tree. Perhaps you meant one branch or one factor. Prime numbers only have two factors, one of them is prime, so if you try to do a factor tree with a prime number, it stops the second you write the number down. And then there's one. One only has one factor, so we won't even bother with a tree. We'll call it a factor twig.
factor tree
The factor tree of 29 would consist of only the number 29 itself, as it is a prime number. Prime numbers have only two factors: 1 and the number itself. Therefore, the factor tree for 29 would simply show 29 at the top with no further branches or factors.
Oh honey, a factor tree is like a family tree for numbers. You start with the number on top and then branch out into its factors, breaking it down into smaller numbers until you can't break it down anymore. It's like a math version of "Who's Your Daddy?" for numbers.
Prime numbers don't have factor trees. So if you can create a tree, your number's composite.
No.
No.
a factor tree
factor tree
No you cannot. You might want to try the factor tree for 27.
Every composite number has its own unique tree, so I guess the answer is all numbers have one tree. Perhaps you meant one branch or one factor. Prime numbers only have two factors, one of them is prime, so if you try to do a factor tree with a prime number, it stops the second you write the number down. And then there's one. One only has one factor, so we won't even bother with a tree. We'll call it a factor twig.
factor tree
When you want to find the prime factorization of a composite number.
Whatever composite number you're trying to find the prime factorization of.
The answer was wrong. The fours should have been factored into 2 * 2. The composite number is 1200.
no because there are multiple ways to do factor trees until u get to all prime numbers