12
The integer is 50.
no, the square root of an integer will not always be another integer. take the integer 27, for example. the square root of 27 is about 5.1961, which is not an integer.No eg square root of 17 is 4.1231056...
27 is an integer and not a fraction. However, it can be expressed in rational form as (27*k)/k where k is an integer.
an integer is just a whole number. Since four doesnt allow rounding up, the nearest integer, 7, will stay the same. your answer is 27.
All three.
The profit of 27 using an integer is 12
An integer for a profit of 12 refers to a whole number that represents a profit amount of 12 units of currency, such as dollars or euros. In this context, the profit is a positive integer, meaning it is 12 itself, as it is a complete, non-fractional value. Thus, the integer is simply 12.
An integer for a profit of 35 refers to the whole number value of 35 itself, as integers are defined as whole numbers that can be positive, negative, or zero. In this context, a profit of 35 means that the profit is $35, which is a positive integer. Therefore, the integer representing the profit is simply 35.
The integer representing a profit of 40 is simply +40. In financial terms, profit is expressed as a positive value, indicating a gain. Therefore, the integer for a profit of 40 is +40.
The answer is 27 since 27 itself is an integer.
The integer is 50.
0.3333
9
The profit of 9, when expressed as an integer, is simply 9. Profit typically refers to the financial gain made after deducting expenses, and in this case, it indicates a positive outcome of 9 units.
Do nothing. 50 is already an integer.
no, the square root of an integer will not always be another integer. take the integer 27, for example. the square root of 27 is about 5.1961, which is not an integer.No eg square root of 17 is 4.1231056...
Yes, by golly, it sure is.