The first one.
They weren't playing eachother.
Oh, what a lovely question! Finding the Highest Common Factor (HCF) is like finding the common thread that ties these numbers together. If we look at 36, 42, and 54, we can see that the largest number that divides them all evenly is 6. So, the HCF for 36, 42, and 54 is 6. Just like how different colors blend together to create a beautiful painting, these numbers come together harmoniously with 6 as their HCF.
HCF of 44, 132 & 143 is 13
Alright, honey, let's cut to the chase. The greatest common factor of 8, 12, and 52 is 4. It's like finding the perfect little black dress that fits all three of them without any alterations. So, there you have it, 4 is the winner in this mathematical fashion show.
The greatest common factor (GCF) of 28, 35, and 70 is 7. To find the GCF, you can list the factors of each number and identify the highest factor that is common among all three numbers. The factors of 28 are 1, 2, 4, 7, 14, and 28. The factors of 35 are 1, 5, 7, 35. The factors of 70 are 1, 2, 5, 7, 10, 14, 35, and 70. The highest common factor among all three numbers is 7.
Assuming that the 2 represents ties, the winning percentage is .619 Assuming that the 7 represents ties, the winning percentage is .738
It depends on the sport and how ties are used. I would use point percentage rather than winning percentage to see which team has a better record. First determine how many points a win is worth and a tie. In NHL hockey, wins are worth 2 and ties are worth 1 point. So for example, a record of 5 wins, 2 losses, 3 ties results in 13 points out of a possible 20 for a .650 point percentage. A team with 5 w, 1 L, 3 t results in 13 points out of possible 18, which is .722 percentage. If you really need to get a winning percentage, try making ties worth 1/2 a win or just drop the ties from the record. So an NFL football team with a record of 8-7-1 is going to have a better winning percentage than an 8-8 team no matter which way you calculate... 8.5/16 or 8/15
Both are the same.The NFL considers a tie as half a win and half a loss. Since there are 2 ties, and 2 * .5 = 1, 1 would be added to the wins and to the losses. This would make the winning percentage for 8-6-2 the same as the winning percentage for 9-7.
winning percent = (number of wins)/(total games played) x 100%
France. 3 losses, 4 ties, 4 wins
Assuming that the "W" is for wins, then the winning percentage is: (wins)/(wins and losses), if ties are not included (as is the case in the MLB preseason) If ties are included, then it's: (wins+ .5*ties)/(all games played) As an example, let's say a team won 5 games, lost 2 and tied 3 others. Excluding ties, the win percentage is 5/(5+2) = 5/7 = .714 Including ties, the win percentage is (5+(.5*3))/(5+2+3) = (5+1.5)/(10) = 6.5/10 = .650
.560 for 9 wins 5 losses and .500 for 8 wins 4 losses and 2 ties.
The NBA team that has the worst winning percentage right now is the Sacramento Kings. There winning percentage is .217 and there record is 15-54. They are currently 26 and 1/2 games back from making the playoffs in the Western Conference, and 39 1/2 games back of the first place Los Angele Lakers.
Since 1970, the Bengals have a total record (regular season and playoffs) of 293-369 for a .440 winning percentage. This ties them for 26th with the Cleveland Browns. Only the Saints (.436 winning percentage), Cardinals (.411), Buccaneers (.403), Lions (.400), and Texans (.362) have a lower winning percentage.
In the standings, a tie counts as half a win and half a loss. Through 10 games of the 2008 season, the Philadelphia Eagles record is 5-5-1. Their winning percentage is .550. This is the same as having a record of 5.5 wins and 4.5 losses (10 games divided into 5.5 wins is .550). The Cinicinnati Bengals record is 1-9-1 and their winning percentage is .136. This is the same as 1.5 wins and 9.5 losses (11 games divided into 1.5 wins is .136).
Before the NHL lockout, there were four categories; Wins, Losses, Ties, and Overtime Losses. Since the lockout there are now only three categories; Wins, Losses, and Overtime losses (which include shootout losses)
The Raiders entered the 2006 season with an overall record of 385-254-11. If you ignore the ties entirely and treat them as non-events, you get a winning percentage of .6025, and you commend the Raiders for not rounding up instead of down. The NFL, however, does not treat ties this way. It counts each as half a win and half a loss, a method that pulls the percentages into the middle, toward .500. This way, the Raiders' cumulative record from 1963-2005 would be the equivalent of 390.5-259.5, or .600769. You'll need to add in the wins/losses for the 2007 season and beyond to get more up to date numbers.