x = 484
64 = 4 cubed and 8 squared.
2744
1729 is the smallest number that can be expressed in two ways as the sum of two cubes.[12cube+9cube] * * * * * ... two positive cubes. 12 cube + 1 cube and 10 cube + 9 cube.
3
Sure, honey, let me break it down for you. No, a prime number cannot be a perfect cube because a prime number is only divisible by 1 and itself. And let me tell you, a perfect cube is the result of multiplying a number by itself three times, so a prime number ain't gonna fit that bill. So, in short, a prime number and a perfect cube are like oil and water - they just don't mix, darling.
2
10
The only solution is that a = 5 then 25a = 25 x 5 = 52 x 5 = 53.
45
5
It is the additive inverse of itself, it is the square, cube, ... any positive power of itself.
A cube is any number multiplied by itself three times, eg 2 cubed = 2³ = 2×2×2 = 8; 1.5³ = 1.5×1.5×1.5 = 3.375 A perfect cube is an integer (whole number) that is the cube of an integer, eg 8 is a perfect cube as it is 2 cubed, but 9 is not a perfect cube as 9 = 2.08008382...³
Here is a method: cube root of 400g = n, where n is an integer cube both sides: 400g = n3 then: g = n3/400 therefore: n3/400 must be an integer if this is so, then n3 must be divisible by 400 with no remainder, and n must be => cube root of 400 which is 7.368 bracket the answer by substitution: let n=8, n cubed = 512 no good let n=12, n cubed = 1728 no good let n=20, n cubed = 8000, 8000/400=20 OK No smaller value of n will be divisible by 400 without a remainder, so g=20 is the smallest positive integer that meets the requirement.
an integer
Because negative numbers multiplied by themselves three times will be negative.
The integer is 26
If by cube you mean perfect cube (a cube of an integer), then no, and the nearest perfect cube is 81.