A fraction (not faction) with an absolute value of at least 1 is an improper fraction. One whose absolute value is in (0, 1) is a proper fraction.
zero is rational because it can be written as a fraction where the denominator is not equal to 0. it can be written as 0/1, 0/2, 0/3, etc
2/13 cannot be written as an improper fraction since [the absolute value of] its numerator is less than [the absolute value of] its denominator. It will remain a proper fraction.
0% as a fraction = 0/1
Yes it is. It can be written as a fraction where the denominator is not 0. For example: 134/1000
It is 0, but, if you insist, it can be written as 0/3.
it's an improper fraction
A fraction (not faction) with an absolute value of at least 1 is an improper fraction. One whose absolute value is in (0, 1) is a proper fraction.
0 x where x != 0
Zero
It is: 0.50 = 1/2 as a fraction
If the two are 0 then the fraction is not defined. Otherwise it has the value 1.
0/3 is equal to nothing, so 0/3 written as a decimal would be 0
Yes, it can be. If the numerator is 0. Then suppose the denominator is 3, which is bigger than 0 (double the numerator). So the value of the fraction is 0/3 = 0.
0 is rational. Rational numbers are numbers that can be written as a fraction. Irrational numbers cannot be expressed as a fraction.
Then the answer is straightforward - 0 When a numerator is zero it means that the value of the fraction is also 0. For example: there are 0/4 pieces of pie The numerator is 0 (the top number) The denominator is 4 (the bottom number) The value of the fraction is 0 because the numerator is zero (there are no pieces of pie)
The equation is undefined when the 0 is on the bottom of a fraction. This is because division by zero is not defined in mathematics and leads to undefined values. If the 0 is on the top of the fraction, the equation can still be evaluated and the value would be 0.