Well, well, well, look who's trying to crack the code! The numbers are decreasing by 2, then increasing by 4, then decreasing by 6, then increasing by 8. So, following the pattern, the number that replaces the question mark should be 39. But hey, I'm just here to spill the tea, not to hold your hand through it.
Chat with our AI personalities
Oh, what a delightful mystery we have here! If we take a closer look, we can see that the numbers are decreasing by 2, then increasing by 4, then decreasing by 6, and then increasing by 8. So, following this pattern, the number that would replace the question mark is 39. Just like adding colors to a painting, sometimes all we need is a little pattern to bring everything together beautifully.
Oh, dude, I see what you did there, trying to make me do math. So, like, the pattern here is just subtracting 6, then adding 24, then subtracting 2, then adding 24... So, like, the number that replaces the question mark is 33. Easy peasy lemon squeezy.
The pattern in the sequence seems to be decreasing by 2, then increasing by 24, then decreasing by 2 again. Following this pattern, the next number after 31 would be 55 (31 - 2 + 24).
sorry your question is not clear what you are asking, try rewording it.
2 213 is a prime number, that means that no two whole numbers can be multiplied other than 1 and 13 to result in 13. so to answer your question, the only common factor these two numbers have is the number 1.
No, 13 is not a composite number.
9991
Since 13 is a prime number (i.e., 13 is the only factor of 13), any number that is not a multiple of 13 is relatively prime to it.