Because of the limitations of the question software, it was not possible to determine what the original equation was supposed to be, so we assumed it is 3x + 5y = 7. It could have just as easily been 3x - 5y = 7, or even 3x/5y = 7.
So, let's solve them all for x.
3x + 5y = 7
3x = 7 - 5y
x = (7 - 5y)/3
How about 3x - 5y = 7?
3x - 5y = 7
3x = 7 + 5y
x = (7 + 5y)/3
And 3x/5y = 7?
3x/5y = 7
3x = 35y
x = 35y/3 Solving for y The above equations wrote the equation so that x is a function of y, not the other way around. Here's how to rewrite the equation so that y is a function of x: 3x + 5y = 7 5y = -3x + 7 y = (-3x + 7)/5
5x + 5y = 19x = 3.8 - yory = 3.8 - x
The [ 2x + 1 ] represents a function of 'y' .
Well, f(x) = 6x + 9 is a function of x {it passes the vertical line test}. but y = 6x + 9 is an equation {linear equation of two variables}
no
You need another equation.
y=3x+12
23
4(x + y - 5) = 0
No, that is a equation.
== == y = -x + 5
69
7x = -3y + 12
y = -x-2
y=-x+8
-8
a function
It is: y = x-1