Yes, it is true that every finite language is regular.
Chat with our AI personalities
No, it is not necessarily true that if language A is regular and language B reduces to A, then language B is also regular.
Oh honey, let me break it down for you. The language defined by the regular expression "add" is actually a regular language because it consists of a single string "add" that can be easily recognized by a finite automaton. So, sorry to burst your bubble, but there's no need to demonstrate what's already true. Hope that clears things up for ya, sweetie!
Yes, it is true that a context-free language is a superset of a regular language.
The keyword "pumping lemma" can be used to prove that a language is regular by showing that any sufficiently long string in the language can be divided into parts that can be repeated or "pumped" to create more strings in the language. If this property holds true for a language, it indicates that the language is regular.
Yes, it is true that if a language is undecidable, then it must be infinite.
No, it is not necessarily true that if language A is regular and language B reduces to A, then language B is also regular.
Oh honey, let me break it down for you. The language defined by the regular expression "add" is actually a regular language because it consists of a single string "add" that can be easily recognized by a finite automaton. So, sorry to burst your bubble, but there's no need to demonstrate what's already true. Hope that clears things up for ya, sweetie!
Yes, it is true that a context-free language is a superset of a regular language.
true
Every human being born on this planet has a soul. So the number always remains a finite number. So the belief is true.
The keyword "pumping lemma" can be used to prove that a language is regular by showing that any sufficiently long string in the language can be divided into parts that can be repeated or "pumped" to create more strings in the language. If this property holds true for a language, it indicates that the language is regular.
No no its a true vector for infinite angular displacement
true
There are an infinite number of numbers. So there is no such thing as "the biggest number in the world". For every (finite) number you can find one bigger than it.
It is true. A line segment has finite length but no width.
No no its a true vector for infinite angular displacement
It's very difficult to answer a yes/no question with 'true' or 'false'.A regular hexagon has 6 obtuse interior angles.A hexagon that's not regular can have fewer than 6 .