The time complexity of an algorithm with a running time of n log n is O(n log n), which means the algorithm's performance grows in proportion to n multiplied by the logarithm of n.
The running time of the heap sort algorithm is O(n log n) in terms of time complexity.
The time complexity of the algorithm is O(log n).
The time complexity of the algorithm is O(n log n), which means the running time grows in proportion to n multiplied by the logarithm of n.
When comparing the time complexity of an algorithm with log(n) versus n, log(n) grows slower than n. This means that an algorithm with log(n) time complexity will generally be more efficient and faster than an algorithm with n time complexity as the input size increases.
The time complexity of sorting an array using a comparison-based sorting algorithm with a complexity of n log n is O(n log n).
The running time of the heap sort algorithm is O(n log n) in terms of time complexity.
The time complexity of the algorithm is O(log n).
The time complexity of the algorithm is O(n log n), which means the running time grows in proportion to n multiplied by the logarithm of n.
When comparing the time complexity of an algorithm with log(n) versus n, log(n) grows slower than n. This means that an algorithm with log(n) time complexity will generally be more efficient and faster than an algorithm with n time complexity as the input size increases.
The time complexity of sorting an array using a comparison-based sorting algorithm with a complexity of n log n is O(n log n).
When comparing the efficiency of algorithms in terms of time complexity, an algorithm with a time complexity of n log n is generally more efficient than an algorithm with a time complexity of n. This means that as the input size (n) increases, the algorithm with n log n will perform better and faster than the algorithm with n.
The time complexity of sorting a list using a comparison-based sorting algorithm with a worst-case time complexity of O(log(n!)) is O(n log n).
By solving a problem in n log n time complexity, the efficiency of an algorithm can be improved because it means the algorithm's running time increases at a slower rate as the input size grows. This allows the algorithm to handle larger inputs more efficiently compared to algorithms with higher time complexities.
The time complexity of the quicksort algorithm is O(n log n) in the average case and O(n2) in the worst case.
The fastest integer multiplication algorithm available is the SchnhageStrassen algorithm, which has a time complexity of O(n log n log log n).
The time complexity of the Huffman coding algorithm is O(n log n), where n is the number of symbols in the input data.
The time complexity of the algorithm is O(n log n).