star
Bus topology is suitable for small networks due to its simplicity and cost-effectiveness. It requires less cable than other topologies, making installation easier and cheaper. Additionally, it allows for easy addition of devices without disrupting the network. However, it is less reliable than star or mesh topologies, as a failure in the main cable can bring down the entire network.
Star network
LAN
A mesh topology is where each node or computer has a direct link to every other node that it needs to talk to. This topology is okay for small computer set ups (e.g. upto 6 computers) that need very high speed communication between them.Its not really used any more because it all gets a bit meshy...
The network topology that features one central cable with terminators at each end is known as a bus topology. In this configuration, all devices are connected to a single linear cable, known as the bus, which facilitates communication among them. This topology is relatively easy to set up and cost-effective for small networks, but it can suffer from collision issues and is less reliable than other topologies, as a failure in the central cable can disrupt the entire network.
Depends on which topology you are used i.e Ring, Bus, Mesh or Star. Like in Ring topology each node is connected to 2 nodes on either side and is suitable for small network. In Star topology there is a central node to which all other nodes are connected, data is transferred from source node to central hub and then to destination node. In Bus topology one long cable act as a back bone to link all the devices and is reliable from hardware point of view.
● Flat: where all the interconnection equipment have the same functions. Topology is easier to implement and has a great ease of management, provided that the network does not increase, then being recommended for small networks. ● Hierarchical: In this model the topology is divided into discrete layers, and each layer is focused on a set of specific functions, allowing the choice correct equipment for each layer. A typical hierarchical topology is composed of layers of core, composed of high-tech equipment, optimized for performance and availability, distribution, where they are concentrated equipment that control the flow of information across the network and access layer, formed by equipment that provides the connections for the network users. Rafael Carvalho
VSAT is the acronym for Very Small Aperture Terminals. VSAT are mostly configured in one of the following network topologies: a star topology, which uses a central uplink site such as an NOC (network operations centre) to transport the data back and forth to each VSAT terminal. This transportation of data to each VSAT takes place through satellite communication. The mesh topology is a type of network topology in which each of the VSAT terminals relays the data via satellite to another terminal. The VSAT terminals act as an information hub. The main advantage of this type of network topology is that it minimizes the need for a centralised uplink site. At times the star network topology and the mesh network topology are combined, which combines the main activity of both network topologies, namely acting as both a central uplinking site and an information hub, which transfers data back and forth to each of its interconnected terminals via satellite communication.
Dell laptop Apple tablets
the ring topology is a network within which all computer are connected like in a circle. The ring topology data transmission is depending on a token. it's a programme given to a computer to allow it to communicate with others computers. it's useful but if one computer goes down, the topology is down too.
Ring topology offers several advantages, including simplicity in installation and configuration, as each device is connected in a circular layout. This structure allows for predictable data transmission since data travels in one direction, reducing the chances of packet collisions. Additionally, it can enhance network performance under moderate loads, making it suitable for small to medium-sized networks. However, it is essential to consider that a failure in any single device can disrupt the entire network, which is a significant drawback.
Star is more appropriate, it's little bit expensive than for instance ring but it's easier to maintain and the bandwidth is higher (depending on UTP you are going to use).